22nd June 2018, Volume 131 Number 1477

Oscar Taylor, Charlene M Rapsey, Gareth J Treharne

People with marginalised sexual and gender identities face many health inequities across diverse areas, including cancer,1,2 addiction and mental health difficulties,3,4 domestic violence5 and sexual health.4,6 Research indicates negative healthcare…

Subscriber content

The full contents of this page is only available to subscribers.

To view this content please login or subscribe

Summary

Negative healthcare experiences are common for people with diverse sexual and gender identities. A survey was distributed to staff responsible for curriculum in the pre-clinical years of New Zealand’s medical schools, inquiring about the sexuality and gender content they teach, and their perceived attitudes around this content. Results showed that LGBTQI-specific content is covered minimally and some staff are aware of a gap in teaching content. The staff felt this content would be easy to teach, but finding the time to include it was difficult. Experience with sexuality and gender in a healthcare setting and further faculty support could potentially help with providing the opportunity to facilitate the sensitive inclusion of sexuality and gender content in the medical school curriculum.

Abstract

Aim

To investigate inclusion of sexuality and gender identity content, attitudes and barriers to inclusion of content in preclinical curricula of New Zealand medical schools from the perspective of key teaching staff.

Method

Staff responsible for curriculum oversight at New Zealand’s two medical schools were invited to complete a mixed-methods survey about sexuality and gender identity content in their modules.

Results

Of 24 respondents, the majority included very little content relating to sexuality or gender identity (33%) or none at all (54%). This content was deemed important by most participants (69%), and none believed there should be less such content in their curriculum. Time was reported to be the main barrier limiting inclusion of such content.

Conclusion

Our finding of limited content is consistent with international literature. Our findings extend the literature by revealing that barriers to greater inclusion of content are not due to overt negative attitudes. Staff responsible for preclinical medical curriculum oversight have positive attitudes about content relating to sexuality and gender identity but perceive curriculum space to be a limiting barrier. This is important as it informs approaches to change. Future interventions with medical schools should focus on methods to increase diverse content as part of existing teaching, education to increase knowledge of LGBTQI relevant material and potentially incorporate strategies used to address unconscious bias. Addressing the perceived barriers of time constraints and lack of relevance is required to ensure medical students receive training to develop the competencies to provide positive healthcare experiences for all patients regardless of sexuality and gender identity.

Author Information

Oscar Taylor, Post-Graduate Clinical Psychology Student, Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine; Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin;
Charlene M Rapsey, Lecturer, Department of Psychological Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin; Gareth J Treharne, Senior Lecturer, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin.

Correspondence

Dr Charlene M Rapsey, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, 464 Cumberland Street, Dunedin 9054.

Correspondence Email

charlene.rapsey@otago.ac.nz

Competing Interests

Nil.

References

  1. Lee R. Health care problems of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. West J Med. 2000; 172:403–408.
  2. Burkhalter JE, Margolies L, Sigurdsson HO, et al. The national LGBT cancer action plan: A white paper of the 2014 national summit on cancer in the LGBT communities. LGBT Health. 2016; 3:19–31.
  3. Cochran SD, Sullivan JG, Mays VM. Prevalence of mental disorders, psychological distress, and mental health services use among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71:53–61.
  4. King M, Nazareth I. The health of people classified as lesbian, gay and bisexual attending family practitioners in London: a controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6:127.
  5. Kulkin HS, Williams J, Borne HF, de la Bretonne D, Laurendine J. A Review of Research on Violence in Same-Gender Couples. Journal of Homosexuality. 2007; 53:71–87.
  6. Lindley LL, Nicholson TJ, Kerby MB, Ning L. HIV/STI associated risk behaviors among self-identified lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender college students in the United States. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2003; 15:423–429.
  7. Bonvicini KA. LGBT healthcare disparities: What progress have we made? Patient Educ Couns. 2017.
  8. Elliott MN, Kanouse DE, Burkhart Q, et al. Sexual minorities in England have poorer health and worse health care experiences: A national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30:9–16.
  9. Bonvicini KA, Perlin MJ. The same but different: Clinician-patient communication with gay and lesbian patients. Patient Education and Counseling. 2003; 51:115–122.
  10. Lee E, Taylor J, Raitt F. ‘It’s not me, it’s them’: How lesbian women make sense of negative experiences of maternity care: A hermeneutic study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011; 67:982–990.
  11. Bockting W, Robinson B, Benner A, Scheltema K. Patient satisfaction with transgender health services. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2009; 30:277–294.
  12. Adams J, McCreanor T, Braun V. Doctoring New Zealand’s gay men. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2008; 121:11–20.
  13. Adams J, McCreanor T, Braun V. Gay men’s explanations of health and how to improve it. Qualitative Health Research. 2013; 23:887–899.
  14. Adams J, Braun V, McCreanor T. Gay Men Talking About Health: Are Sexuality and Health Interlinked? American Journal of Men’s Health. 2012; 6:182–193.
  15. Ludlam AH, Saxton PJ, Dickson NP, Hughes AJ. General practitioner awareness of sexual orientation among a community and internet sample of gay and bisexual men in New Zealand. Journal of Primary Health Care. 2015; 7:204–212.
  16. Adams J, Dickinson P, Asiasiga L. Mental health promotion and prevention services to gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex populations in New Zealand. Auckland 2012.
  17. Shindel AW, Parish SJ. Sexuality education in North American medical schools: Current status and future directions. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013; 10.
  18. Parameshwaran V, Cockbain BC, Hillyard M, Price JR. Is the Lack of Specific Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) Health Care Education in Medical School a Cause for Concern? Evidence From a Survey of Knowledge and Practice Among UK Medical Students. J Homosex. 2016:1–15.
  19. White W, Brenman S, Paradis E, et al. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patient Care: Medical Students’ Preparedness and Comfort. Teach Learn Med. 2015; 27:254–263.
  20. Müller A. Teaching lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health in a South African health sciences faculty: Addressing the gap. BMC Medical Education. 2013; 13:174.
  21. Clark TC, Lucassen MFG, Bullen P, et al. The health and well-being of transgender high school students: Results from the New Zealand Adolescent Health Survey (Youth’12). Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014; 55:93–99.
  22. Daniel H, Butkus R. Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health disparities: Executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015; 163:135–137.
  23. Graham K, Treharne GJ, Ruzibiza C, Nicolson M: The importance of health(ism): A focus group study of lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer and transgender individuals’ understandings of health. J Health Psychol. 2015; 22:237–247.
  24. Sanchez AA, Southgate E, Rogers G, Duvivier RJ: Inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Health in Australian and New Zealand Medical Education. LGBT Health. 2017; 4:295–303.
  25. Obedin-Maliver J, Goldsmith ES, Stewart L, et al. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender-Related Content in Undergraduate Medical Education. JAMA. 2011; 306:971–977.
  26. International Lesbian G, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association,: The Personal and the Political: Attitudes to LGBTI People Around the World. Geneva 2016.
  27. University of Otago Medical School: Curriculum Map. 2017; http://medmap.otago.ac.nz/ui/, 2017.
  28. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher. 2004; 33:14–26.
  29. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3:77–101.
  30. Lim F, Johnson M, Eliason M. A national survey of faculty knowledge, experience, and readiness for teaching lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health in baccalaureate nursing programs. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2015; 36:144–152.
  31. Colleges AoAM. Implementing curricular and institutional climate changes to improve health care for individuals who are LGBT, gender nonconforming, or born with DSD In: Hollenbach AD, Eckstrand KL, Dreger A, eds. Washington, DC2014.
  32. Fallin-Bennett K. Implicit Bias Against Sexual Minorities in Medicine: Cycles of Professional Influence and the Role of the Hidden Curriculum. Academic Medicine. 2015; 90:549–552.

Download

The downloadable PDF version of this article is only available to subscribers.

To view this content please login or subscribe