1st December 2017, Volume 130 Number 1466

David McLean, Bill Glass, Andrea ‘t Mannetje, Jeroen Douwes

Although often thought of as an historical issue, respirable crystalline silica (RCS) remains one of the most common occupational exposures worldwide.1,2 Silicosis is a progressive and irreversible fibrotic lung disease,…

Subscriber content

The full contents of this page is only available to subscribers.

To view this content please login or subscribe

Summary

Heavy exposure to dust containing very fine particles of silica has long been known to cause silicosis or a scarring of the lung. From many studies conducted overseas, it has been found that even low levels of exposure also increase the risk of lung cancer and kidney disease. We measured the levels of exposure of construction workers, mainly when cutting or grinding concrete. We found that a sizeable proportion of construction workers did have exposure that was hazardous, and recommend that dust levels need to be reduced to prevent disease.

Abstract

Aim

To assess personal exposure to respirable dust and respirable crystalline silica (RCS) in New Zealand construction workers.

Method

In a pilot study, 39 personal samples were collected from a cross-section of workers engaged in a range of tasks performed on construction sites that were expected to entail exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Nine static samples were taken at locations adjacent to these tasks. Particle size-selective sampling heads were used to collect the respirable fraction of airborne particulates. Dust concentrations were determined gravimetrically, while crystalline silica was analysed using x-ray diffraction.

Results

Almost half of the personal crystalline silica samples exceeded the New Zealand Workplace Exposure Standard (NZ WES), while 56% exceeded the more stringent international recommendation (ACGIH TLV). The tasks associated with the highest RCS levels were concrete grinding and cutting. Two of four static samples collected close to (silica-containing) Linea board cutting exceeded the ACGIH TLV for RCS, indicating the potential for bystander exposure.

Conclusion

A large proportion of workers performing common tasks in the construction industry may be exposed to levels of respirable dust and crystalline silica exceeding national standards and international recommendations. These results suggest that workers in this industry may be at risk of developing silica-related diseases, including silicosis, lung cancer, COPD and chronic renal disease. Action is required to improve dust control to reduce silica exposure and the associated health risks.

Author Information

David McLean, Senior Research Officer, Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University;
Bill Glass, Professorial Research Fellow, Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University and Departmental Medical Practitioner, WorkSafe New Zealand; Andrea ‘t Mannetje, Associate Professor, Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University; Jeroen Douwes, Professor and Director, Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by WorkSafe New Zealand, and the sampling and analysis were conducted by K2 Environmental.

Correspondence

Dr David McLean, Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, PO Box 756, Wellington.

Correspondence Email

d.j.mclean@massey.ac.nz

Competing Interests

Nil.

References

  1. Steenland K. One agent, many diseases: Exposure-response data and comparative risks of different outcomes following silica exposure. Am J Ind Med. 2005; 48:16–23.
  2. Leung CC, Tak Sun Yu I, Chen W. Silicosis. Lancet. 2012; 379:2008–18. 
  3. Silicosis: Report of the Interdepartmental Committee, Bulletin No 57, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington, New Zealand, 1938. 
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Monographs on the evaluation of silicates, coal dust and para-aramid fibrils. Vol. 68. Lyon: World Health Organisation, IARC, 1997.
  5. Cassidy A, ‘t Mannetje A, van Tongeren M, et al. Occupational exposure to crystalline silica and risk of lung cancer. A multicentre Case-Control study in Europe. Epidemiology. 2007; 18(1):36–43.
  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): A Review of Human Carcinogens. Part C: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres and Dusts. Lyon. France: IARC, 2012.
  7. Parks C, Conrad K, Cooper G. Occupational exposure to crystalline silica and autoimmune disease. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107(5):793–802.
  8. Pollard KM. Silica, Silicosis, and Autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2016; 7(97).
  9. Millerick-May M, Schrauben S, Reilly M, Rosenman K. Silicosis and chronic renal disease. Am J Ind Med. 2015; 58:730–6.
  10. Workplace Exposure Standards and Biological Exposure Indices. June 2016, 8th Edition, WorkSafe New Zealand/Mahi Haumaru Aotearoa.
  11. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica-Review of health effects literature and preliminary quantitative risk assessment. OSHA-2010-0034.
  12. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: 2015 Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, Ohio. ACGIH, 2015.
  13. Glass WI, McLean D, Armstrong R, et al. Respiratory health and silica dust levels in the Extractive Industry. Occupational Safety and Health Service, Department of Labour. Occupational Health Report Series, Number 9, 2003.
  14. Van Deurssen E, Pronk A, Spaan S, et al. Quartz and respirable dust in the Dutch construction industry: a baseline exposure assessment as part of a multidimensional intervention approach. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014; 58:724–38.
  15. Beaudry C, Lavoué J, Sauvé J-F, et al. Occupational exposure to silica in construction workers: A literature-based exposure database. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013; 10:71–77.
  16. Sauvé J-F, Beaudry C, Begin D, et al. Statistical modelling of crystalline silica exposure by trade in the construction industry using a database compiled from the literature. J Environ Monit. 2012; 14:2512–20.
  17. Si S, Carey R, Reid A, et al. The Australian Workforce Exposures Study: Prevalence of occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016; 60(5):631–7.
  18. http://www.worksafe.govt.nz/worksafe/research/health-and-safety-data/pdf-and-documents-library/construction-sector-by-numbers.pdf 
  19. UK Health and Safety Laboratory. Methods for the determination of hazardous substances. 101 Crystalline silica in respirable airborne dusts. HSE Books. Feb 2005.
  20. Bolt HM, Huici-Montagud A. Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens. Arch Toxicol. 2008; 82(1): 61–64.
  21. Wheeler MW, Park RM, Bailer AJ, et al. Historical context and recent advances in exposure-response estimation for deriving occupational exposure limits. J Occup Environ Hyg, 2015; 12:S7–S17.
  22. Firth HM, Cooke KR, Herbison GP. Male cancer incidence by occupation: New Zealand 1972–84. Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25(1):14–21.
  23. Corbin M, McLean D, ‘t Mannetje A, et al. Lung cancer and occupation: A New Zealand cancer registry-based case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 2011; 54:89–101.

Download

The downloadable PDF version of this article is only available to subscribers.

To view this content please login or subscribe