Admitting very elderly patients to intensive care units (ICU) is a controversial issue. With current demographic projections, increasing life expectancy and increasing complexity of interventions, we will see many more…
The full contents of this page is only available to subscribers.
To view this content please login or subscribe
The decision whether to admit and treat the very elderly patient with septic shock in ICU is a complex decision. Although age in itself is not a reason to deny a patient ICU admission, it is taken into account in context of the burden of chronic and acute disease. The patient selection and subsequent treatment at Tauranga Hospital, a secondary level New Zealand hospital, produced results that saw most of the patients during a five-year period, including those >85 years, being discharged alive from hospital. This study suggests that with carefully considered selection, elderly patients greater than 85 years may have an acceptable long-term outcome following an episode of septic shock.
Admitting very elderly, critically ill patients to ICU is controversial. We compared our mortality data in a subgroup of elderly patients to internationally published outcomes.
Tauranga Hospital ICU retrospectively investigated their mortality outcomes for patients with septic shock. The ANZICS adult database (AORTIC), Tauranga Hospital computer records and medical records were used to identify the study cohort and provide information on demographics, admission times and shock types between January 2009 and December 2014. Patients were divided into groups; not old (<74 years), old (75–84 years) and very old (>85 years) to compare survival statistics at ICU discharge, hospital discharge, 28 days, six months and 12 months.
Patients in the >85 year group at Tauranga ICU had a 38.5% survival.
With careful selection, elderly patients with septic shock may have an acceptable outcome.