16th December 2016, Volume 129 Number 1447

Chloë Campbell, Caroline Morris, Rhiannon Braund

Clinicians routinely make decisions to optimise outcomes from the use of medicines. Given the rate at which new information is produced, sustaining a current knowledge base for this decision-making is…

Subscriber content

The full contents of this page is only available to subscribers.

To view this content please login or subscribe

Summary

Formal medicines information services are available in six hospitals, but the full potential of such services is yet to be realised in New Zealand. A nationally coordinated medicines information service that encompassed current health strategy goals—patient driven, whole team integration and the use of smart systems—could provide efficient, effective support across the health system for clinical problem-solving, continuing education and knowledge translation activities, contributing positively to the safe and effective use of medicines.

Abstract

Aim

To determine the current availability and role of medicines information services in New Zealand.

Method

A 36-question online survey was used to collect quantitative data about four areas of medicines information service provision: structure, availability, users and governance. The pharmacy service leader of each of the 29 public hospitals was invited by e-mail to participate. If considered appropriate, another member of the pharmacy staff could be nominated to complete the survey on their behalf.

Results

The response rate was 93% (n=27). All respondents accept medicines information questions from health professionals within their local hospital, with a large proportion (85%) also accepting questions from health professionals from primary care. However, active promotion of medicines information services is rare, and health professionals within local hospitals are the most frequent service users. Although six hospitals have a formal service with dedicated staff, medicines information provision by hospital pharmacists in New Zealand is predominantly informal.

Conclusion

The full potential of formal medicines information services is yet to be realised in New Zealand. Greater national co-ordination could enhance access to medicines information support and contribute positively to the safe and effective use of medicines across the health system.

Author Information

Chloë Campbell, PhD Candidate, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin;
Caroline Morris, Senior Lecturer, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington; Rhiannon Braund, Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, Dunedin.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the hospital pharmacists who participated in this study.

Correspondence

Chloë Campbell, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054.

Correspondence Email

chloe.campbell@postgrad.otago.ac.nz

Competing Interests

Chloë Campbell was involved in development of a database application for recording medicines information enquiries that is currently in use in six New Zealand hospitals.

References

  1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010; 7:e1000326.
  2. Associate Minister of Health, Minister of Health. Medicines New Zealand: Contributing to good health outcomes for all New Zealanders. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2007.
  3. Ministry of Health. Implementing Medicines New Zealand 2015 to 2020. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2015.
  4. Del Fiol G, Workman T, Gorman PN. Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014; 174:710–8.
  5. Dovey S, Fraser T, Tilyard M, et al. ‘Really simple, summary, bang! That’s what I need’ - Clinical information needs of New Zealand general practitioners and the resources they use to meet them. N Z Fam Physician. 2006; 33:18–24.
  6. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ. 1999; 319:358–61.
  7. Clarke MA, Belden JL, Koopman RJ, et al. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2013; 30:178–90.
  8. Brown JN. Cost Savings Associated With a Dedicated Drug Information Service in an Academic Medical Center. Hosp Pharm. 2011; 46:680–4.
  9. Hedegaard U, Damkier P. Problem-oriented drug information: physicians’ expectations and impact on clinical practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 65:515–22.
  10. Kinky DE, Erush SC, Laskin MS, et al. Economic impact of a drug information service. Ann Pharmacother. 1999; 33:11–6.
  11. Lyrvall H, Nordin C, Jonsson E, et al. Potential savings of consulting a drug information center. Ann Pharmacother. 1993; 27:1540.
  12. Rutter J, Fitzpatrick R, Rutter P. What effect does medicine advice provided by UK Medicines Information pharmacists have on prescriber practice and patient care: a qualitative primary care study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 21:307–12.
  13. Innes AJ, Bramley DM, Wills S. The impact of UK Medicines Information services on patient care, clinical outcomes and medicines safety: an evaluation of healthcare professionals’ opinions. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2014; 21:222–8.
  14. Melnyk PS, Shevchuk YM, Remillard AJ. Impact of the dial access drug information service on patient outcome. Ann Pharmacother. 2000; 34:585–92.
  15. Webster T. The Hospital Pharmacists’ Association Information Committee: the first 25 years 1965–1990. New Zealand Hospital Pharmacists’ Association Conference, 1990.
  16. Gardiner S, Kirkpatrick C, Begg E. Fifteen years of drug information in Christchurch Hospital. N Z Med J. 2001; 114:393–5.
  17. Buckham B. A Survey of Medicines Information Services in New Zealand New Zealand Hospital Pharmacists’ Association Conference, 2005.
  18. Anderson E, Basman G, Bayer G, et al. SHPA standards of practice for medicines information services. J Pharm Pract Res. 2013; 43:53–56.
  19. Ghaibi S, Ipema H, Gabay M. ASHP Guidelines on the pharmacist’s role in providing drug information. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015; 72:573–7.
  20. UKMi. UKMi Audit standards and toolkit: Protocol for measuring quality in NHS Medicines Information Services. UK Medicines Information Clinical Governance Working Group, 2010.
  21. New Zealand Hospital Pharmacy Contact List. New Zealand Hospital Pharmacists’ Association, 2013. (Accessed 7 September 2016 at www.nzhpa.org.nz)
  22. Alvan G, Andersson ML, Asplund AB, et al. The continuing challenge of providing drug information services to diminish the knowledge-practice gap in medical practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 69 Suppl 1:65–72.
  23. Lewis PJ, Ashcroft DM, Dornan T, et al. Exploring the causes of junior doctors’ prescribing mistakes: a qualitative study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 78:310–9.
  24. Ndosi M, Newell R. Medicine information sources used by nurses at the point of care. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19:2659–61.
  25. Alkhaldi N, Desborough J, Wright D, et al. A Five Year Review of Patient Focussed Medicine Information Queries at a Large UK Teaching Trust: Assessing the Trends, Predicting the Future. J Pharma Care Health Sys. 2014; 1:116.
  26. Reppe LA, Spigset O, Böttiger Y, et al. Factors associated with time consumption when answering drug-related queries to Scandinavian drug information centres: A multi-centre study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 70:1395–401.
  27. Timpe EM, Motl SE. Frequency and complexity of queries to an academic drug information center, 1995–2004. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005; 62:2511–4.
  28. Schjøtt J, Reppe LA, Roland P-DH, et al. A question–answer pair (QAP) database integrated with websites to answer complex questions submitted to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS): a descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2012; 2:e000642.
  29. Drug Information Annual Report. Christchurch: Department of Clinical Pharmacology, 2012. (Accessed 7 June 2016 at www.druginformation.co.nz)
  30. About UKMi. Nottingham: UK Medicines Information, 2015. (Accessed 7 June 2016 at www.ukmi.nhs.uk/ukmi/about)
  31. Salat D, Llop R, Aguilera C, et al. Therapeutic enquiries about biological agents as a tool to identify safety aspects and patterns of use. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2015; 23:161–5.

Download

The downloadable PDF version of this article is only available to subscribers.

To view this content please login or subscribe