 
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 22-October-2004, Vol 117 No 1204 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[full text] [PDF] Resident Medical Officer working conditions in New Zealand: results of a recent survey
Stephen Child, Andrew Old
AbstractAims To survey Resident Medical Officers (RMOs) and Senior Medical Officers (SMOs) working at Auckland District Health Board (ADHB) on various aspects of RMO-working conditions and to trial the use of electronic keypad responders for this purpose. Methods In April 2004, the Physicians Grand Round at ADHB was used as a forum to conduct a survey on RMO working conditions in New Zealand. Results were collected anonymously using electronic keypad responders and recorded in a spreadsheet to allow analysis and comparison of the two professional groups. Results 27 RMOs and 32 SMOs attended and participated in the survey, answering 11 questions. Responses showed significant differences between the two groups in 7 of the 11 questions asked. In addition, both groups favoured changes to the status quo on a significant number of issues. Conclusions RMOs and SMOs in New Zealand have differing opinions regarding the working conditions of RMOs. This study supports the need for wider scale, national discussion of these issues and the development of appropriate strategies to address these differences and their implications.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other journals |
|