![]() |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Hayden McRobbie, Chris Bullen, Marewa Glover, Robyn
Whittaker,
Mark Wallace-Bell, Trish Fraser
Stopping
smoking reduces smoking related disease and premature death and is a key health
improvement objective in many countries, including New
Zealand.1 Smoking cessation guidelines
contribute to achieving this high-priority objective.
The New Zealand Guidelines for Smoking Cessation were first
published in 1999 and later revised in 2002.2 A
2003 survey of guidelines users undertaken by the New Zealand Guidelines Group
(NZGG) found that the 2002 guidelines needed to be
updated.3 Considerable change has occurred even
since 2002, with the emergence of new evidence, pharmacotherapies and other
treatments, as well as further amendments to smokefree legislation.
This paper summarises the 2007
guidelines,4 including a description and
summary of the evidence base for the main recommendations, the evidence base,
and contains information about their application to priority population groups,
such as pregnant women, people who use mental health and addiction
services.
MethodGuidelines
development process—The guidelines were commissioned by the
Ministry of Health in mid-2006 and developed by a guidelines development group
with expertise in smoking cessation and specialist advisory groups comprising
academics, researchers, community, medical and nursing practitioners, and
providers and trainers with representation also from members of priority
population groups.
The process followed as closely as possible the steps
recommended in the internationally recognised Appraisal of Guidelines for
Research & Evaluation (AGREE) tool.5
Underpinning the guidelines was an updated literature review, undertaken from
2002 (the date of the previous literature review) to March 2006. The key sources
of data were relevant systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Collaboration
and a systematic review undertaken by the US Department of Health and Human
Services to inform the US Treating Tobacco Use
Guidelines.6 These were supplemented with
findings from other systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
The quality of all the reviews and trials was assessed using standard appraisal
methods.7
Analysis—Recommendations
were then formulated from the findings of the literature review. Each
recommendation was assigned a grade based on the level of empirical evidence
from the literature review, using the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG) system
as follows: A: The recommendation is supported by good (strong)
evidence. B: The recommendation is supported by fair
(reasonable) evidence, but there may be minimal inconsistency or
uncertainty. C: The recommendation is supported by expert
opinion (published) only. I: There is insufficient evidence to
make a recommendation. ✓ Good practice point (in the
opinion of the guideline development group). More detailed explanation of this
grading system can be found in the NZGG Guidelines
Handbook.8
FindingsKey changes from previous
guidelines—Two key changes from previous guidelines are noted in
the 2007 smoking cessation guidelines. First, reference to the ‘Stages of
Change’ model9 has been removed. The
usefulness of this widely used model for smoking cessation treatment has
recently been challenged.10 Although many
practitioners may continue to use the model, we considered this insufficiently
supported by evidence to include in the guidelines. Second, we have structured
the guidelines around a new, simplified memory aid to guide practitioners, that
incorporates and replaces the widely used ‘5As’ (ask, advise,
assess, assist, arrange).2 ‘ABC’ is
a far simpler and thus more easily remembered mnemonic that prompts healthcare
professionals (HCPs) to Ask about smoking status; give
Brief advice to stop smoking to all smokers and offer
evidence-based Cessation support. The key recommendations are
listed in Table 1.
Ask about smoking status—All people
attending any healthcare service should be asked if they smoke tobacco, and
their smoking status should be recorded in their clinical records. The records
of anyone who smokes, or has recently quit, should be updated
regularly—ideally, once a year.
Brief advice to stop
smoking—Brief advice to stop smoking can be provided in as little
as 30 seconds.11 When given by a doctor brief
advice increases long-term abstinence by approximately 2.5% compared to no
advice at all.12 Despite few studies
investigating the effect of brief advice delivered by other
HCPs,13-15 it is highly likely to be
beneficial.
Brief advice appears to work by triggering people to make a
quit attempt rather than by increasing the chances of success of a quit
attempt.16 It also seems to have its greatest
effect on less dependent smokers.12 For more
dependent smokers (such as those whose time to the first cigarette of the day is
within 30 minutes of waking), it is important that brief advice is followed by
an offer of cessation support.
Table 1. Key recommendations
Figure 1
![]() Source: New Zealand Smoking Cessation
Guidelines Liftout. Ministry of Health, August 2007. http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagesmh/6663/$File/nz-smoking-cessation-guidelines-insert.pdf
Advice can be strengthened if it can be linked to a
smoker’s existing smoking related medical condition or to protecting
children and young people from exposure to secondhand
smoke.17 An example of how to give brief advice
to stop smoking is shown in Figure 1.
Cessation
support—There are many different ways
of providing cessation support. However, the two key components that have been
shown to be most effective are multi-session support and
pharmacotherapy.6 The support that individual
HCPs can offer will depend upon their smoking cessation knowledge, skills and
available time. For those who have little time to spare referral to services
that provide effective interventions (e.g. Aukati Kai Paipa or the Quitline)
should be made.
Proactive telephone
support for smoking cessation increases long-term abstinence rates compared
to brief advice.18 Adding telephone support to
medication increases short-19 and
long-term20 abstinence rates over that of
medication alone. There is no advantage in adding telephone support to
face-to-face support.18 However, when the
intensity of face-to-face counselling is low, such as providing a single
counselling session for hospital in-patients, additional follow-up with
telephone counselling has been shown to have a positive
effect.21
Face-to-face cessation support, delivered
individually or in a group setting, has been shown to be more effective than
brief advice.6,22,23 There is no evidence that
any one effective behaviour change method (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy,
motivational interviewing, withdrawal-oriented treatment) is superior to
another. More intensive support (relating to the frequency and duration of
contacts with smokers) is generally associated with higher abstinence
rates.6,24,25 The professional background of
the HCP does not appear to influence smoking cessation
outcome.6 Cessation rates are generally higher
when medication is used in combination with face-to-face support.
Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) approximately
doubles the chances of long-term abstinence compared with
placebo.26 It appears to be as effective as
bupropion and nortriptyline, but as yet there are no published studies comparing
NRT to the recently registered smoking medication, varenicline. NRT’s main
mechanism of action is to reduce the severity of withdrawal symptoms associated
with smoking cessation.
There are six different NRT products (patches, gum,
sublingual tablets, inhalers, lozenges, and nasal spray) that deliver nicotine
in different ways but they appear to be equally effective. At the time of
writing, only the first four products are available in New Zealand and only
patches and gum are currently subsidised in New Zealand via the Quit
Card NRT exchange card system. Product selection can be guided by client
preference, however more dependent smokers benefit from higher dose products.
NRT products should be used for 8 to 12 weeks, but a small
number of smokers may need to use it for
longer.27 There is a moderate advantage to
using a combination of NRT products over just a single
product.26 There are no safety concerns with
long-term or combination NRT use and NRT is safe to use by people with
cardiovascular disease (CVD).28 There is a
small potential risk to the fetus when using NRT in pregnancy however this risk
is many times less than continued smoking.29
Oral NRT products (e.g. gum, inhaler, microtab, and lozenge)
are preferable to patches in pregnancy and in people with unstable
CVD.28 29 There is insufficient evidence that
the use of NRT by young people who smoke improves continuous 6-month abstinence
rates. Nevertheless, expert opinion is that NRT may be considered for use by
dependent adolescents who want to stop
smoking.30
Bupropion (Zyban™) is an antidepressant
medication that doubles the chances of long-term abstinence compared with
placebo.31 Bupropion acts to reduce the
severity of withdrawal symptoms, but it may also have other actions that help
people stop.32 It appears to be as effective as
NRT and nortriptyline, but is less effective than
varenicline.33,34 There is insufficient
evidence to recommend combining bupropion with any other smoking cessation
medications, to recommend its use by pregnant women and adolescents who smoke,
or its use in preventing smoking relapse. Bupropion has a number of
contraindications and cautions for use but can be used by those with stable
cardiovascular and respiratory disease.31
Nortriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant that is
also effective in aiding smoking cessation. Like NRT and bupropion,
nortriptyline approximately doubles the chances of long-term abstinence compared
to placebo.31 The main advantage is its low
cost. Nortriptyline is currently regarded as a second-line therapy by some
smoking cessation guidelines6 and is not
mentioned at all by others, partly due to higher side effect profile compared to
other smoking cessation medicines.35 There are
a number of contraindications and cautions for use that are well documented
elsewhere.36
Varenicline (Champix™) is a partial agonist
of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and reduces the severity of tobacco
withdrawal symptoms whilst simultaneously reducing the rewarding effects of
nicotine. It approximately triples the chances of long-term abstinence compared
to placebo.37 To date, Varenicline has
demonstrated a good safety profile, with transient nausea being the most
commonly reported side effect. There are no known clinically significant drug
interactions.
Smoking
cessation interventions for specific
groups—Māori have a high
smoking prevalence (46%) with particular sub-groups such as Māori women of
childbearing age (15–39 years) having smoking rates of up to
61%.38 Interventions that work in the general
population (for example, support and medication) appear to be at least as
effective for Māori.39
Aukati Kai Paipa, a smoking cessation approach
developed by Māori for Māori is predominantly delivered by Māori
health organisations as well as other hospital and community-based clinics. It
is whānau-focused, operates in a Māori setting utilising strong local
ties, and adopts a holistic approach to health. Smoking cessation components
typically combine NRT with support, a Māori health approach addressing all
elements of wellbeing, and regular follow-up. An evaluation of this service
showed positive results.39
An evaluation of the Quitline services also showed telephone
support to be effective for Māori who want help in stopping
smoking.40 Finally, these evaluations are
supported by a RCT that showed bupropion to be effective in assisting Māori
to stop smoking.41
Smoking cessation is also a priority in Pacific
people (39% of males and 33% of females are current
smokers38). There are limited data regarding
the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions in Pacific populations, although
there is no reason to expect that interventions known to work in the general
population would be any less efficacious for them. However, such interventions
need to be tailored to be maximally effective, and culturally appropriate models
of delivery may increase acceptance of treatment. This also applies to people
from other ethnic groups who smoke.
Pregnant women who smoke should be encouraged to
stop at anytime throughout a pregnancy, although the greatest benefits are
gained from early cessation (within the first
trimester).42 There is modest evidence for the
effectiveness of intensive smoking cessation support delivered to pregnant
women.43 The evidence for the effectiveness of
NRT in helping pregnant women stop smoking is limited. However, expert opinion
is that NRT can be used in pregnancy [intermittent dosing forms (e.g. gum,
inhaler, microtab] are recommended over patch) if an assessment of the various
risks and benefits to the mother, pregnancy, and baby is
favourable.29
HCPs should balance the significant risks of continued
smoking against the risks of providing NRT to help a pregnant woman stop smoking
(more information on these risks can be found in the guidelines document).
Young people (15–29 years) have high rates of
smoking relative to other age groups.38 There
is insufficient evidence to confirm the effectiveness of cessation interventions
specifically aimed at helping young people stop smoking, or to recommend that
any particular models be integrated into standard
practice.44 Given the lack of clear evidence on
specific interventions for young people, it is recommended that interventions be
based on those that are known to be effective in helping adults.
The
hospital and preoperative environment offers an opportunity
for HCPs to help people stop smoking. Admission to hospital with a smoking
related illness provides a “teachable moment” and may be a
particularly effective time to intervene. However, all smokers regardless of
reason for admission should be advised to quit and offered cessation support.
Preoperative smoking cessation decreases the risks of wound infection, delayed
wound healing, and postoperative pulmonary and cardiac
complications45 and so should be recommended to
people awaiting surgery.46 To be effective
smoking cessation interventions provided in hospital need to include at least 1
month of out-patient follow-up contact.47
Smoking is common in people with mental illnesses
and they are typically also highly
dependent.48–51 More intensive smoking
cessation interventions appear to be beneficial in this group. Such
interventions should include multi-session support and medication. Most people
with mental health disorders do not experience a worsening in the symptoms of
their illness when they stop smoking.52 Smoking
cessation can precipitate a relapse of depression in some people, but this is
rare53 and is does not justify not supporting
them to stop smoking. Rather, it warrants closer monitoring of their mental
health status. Smoking cessation can affect the metabolism of some medications,
including those used to treat mental illness,54
so dosage adjustments may occasionally be
required.55
In New Zealand, approximately 56% of non-institutionalised
people with substance use disorders smoke
tobacco.56 The evidence shows that smoking
cessation interventions increase short-term quit rates in these
people,57,58 but there is currently
insufficient evidence supporting long-term effectiveness. Smoking cessation
rarely precipitates a relapse of a substance use
disorder.59,60 However, this should not be seen
as a justification for not encouraging quitting, but rather for monitoring
closely and providing more intensive support.
Relapse prevention and
repeat quit attempts—There is insufficient evidence to support
any particular approach to relapse
prevention.61 The majority of attempts to stop
smoking are unsuccessful, and people who do not succeed should be encouraged to
try again. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a minimum time between
attempts and so people should be offered cessation support whenever they want
it.62,63 Treatment choice should be guided by
learning from prior cessation attempts and individual preference. It is likely
that a more intensive treatment is required on a subsequent attempt.
Other treatments and
interventions—Many other smoking cessation treatments and
interventions are available. However, these lack sufficient evidence of any
impact on long-term abstinence and cannot therefore be recommended. These
include hypnosis,64
acupuncture,65
anxiolytics,31 incentives or
competitions,66
Nicobrevin,67
NicoBloc,68 St John’s
wort,69,70
lobeline,71 and quit and win
contests.72
Some interventions show promise (e.g.
exercise,73
cytisine74 and glucose
tablets75) but need further investigation
before they can be recommended. There is evidence that clonidine is helpful for
smoking cessation however, due to its adverse effect profile, it is not
recommended for routine use.
ConclusionsThe 2007 NZ Smoking Cessation
Guidelines4 provide up-to-date evidence-based
recommendations on how to help people stop smoking. Importantly, they provide a
simple model (ABC) that should facilitate the integration of the key elements of
smoking cessation provision into everyday practice.
There is a strong case for systematic smoking cessation
advice from HCPs and that smoking cessation interventions are some of the most
cost-effective therapeutic interventions available. Therefore it is imperative
that every person that has contact with the healthcare system should be asked at
least annually if they smoke and their response documented. People who smoke
should be given brief advice to stop, and an offer of support to help them stop
smoking. This can include referral to local or national smoking cessation
services, or provision of effective pharmacotherapy and/or behavioural support.
Furthermore, clinical managers have a responsibility to
ensure that systems are in place to enable the effective implementation and
delivery of the ABCs of smoking cessation within their healthcare setting. Both
HCPs and healthcare managers should refer to the
Guidelines4 for detail of their application to
clinical practice. From time-to-time as new evidence becomes available these
Guidelines will need to be updated.
Funding: The development of the 2007
New Zealand Smoking Cessation Guidelines was funded by the Ministry of
Health.
Competing interests: Dr Glover has
undertaken research and consultancy for (and received honoraria for) speaking at
meetings from the manufacturers of smoking cessation medications. She has also
provided smoking cessation training for Novartis and Te Hotu Manawa Māori
for the Aukati Kai Paipa Pilot and Quitline. Drs McRobbie, Whittaker and
Wallace-Bell have undertaken research and consultancy for, and received
honoraria for speaking at meetings from the manufacturers of smoking cessation
medications.
Author information: Hayden McRobbie,
Research Fellow, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Auckland,
Auckland; Chris Bullen, Associate Director, Clinical Trials
Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland; Marewa Glover,
Director, Auckland Tobacco Control Research Centre, University of Auckland,
Auckland; Robyn Whittaker, Research Fellow, Clinical Trials
Research Unit, University of Auckland, Auckland; Trish Fraser,
Director, Global Public Health, Glenorchy, Otago; Mark Wallace-Bell, Senior
Lecturer in Addiction, National Addiction Centre, School of Medicine and Health
Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch
Acknowledgments: We acknowledge the work of
other members of the guidelines consortium:
Haikiu Baiabe, Pacific Island Heartbeat; Denise Barlow,
National Heart Foundation; Kaaren Beverley, Smokefree Mental Health Co-ordinator
Auckland District Health Board; Stewart Eadie, National Heart Foundation;
Professor Doug Selman, University of Otago School of Medicine and Health
Sciences. We are also grateful to the following people involved in consultation
and peer review: Associate Professor Joanne Barnes, Herbal Medicines, School of
Pharmacy, The University of Auckland; Susana Levi, Smoking Cessation Specialist,
Health Pacifica Doctors; Stephanie Cowan, Director, Education for Change; Dr
Peter Martin, The Quit Group; Jessica Walker, Smoking Cessation Specialist,
Counties Manukau DHB; Professor Ross McCormick, Director Goodfellow Unit, The
University of Auckland; Dr Tana Fishman, Director of Undergraduate Medical
Education, The University of Auckland; Steve Cook, Smokefree DHB Co-ordinator,
Hutt Valley DHB
Sue Taylor, T & T Consulting Ltd; Patsi Davies, Smokefree Hospitals Mental Health Co-ordinator, Waikato DHB; Mike Loveman, Nurse Keyworker, Community Mental Health Counties, CMDHB; Basil Fernandes, Lifestyle Co-ordinator Auckland/Northern Region, Pathways Inc.; Barbara Anderson, Te Korowai Aroha; Deb Christiansen, Education and Training Co-ordinator, Auckland Regional Consumer Network; Judi Clements, Chief Executive Officer, Mental Health Foundation; Professor Cindy Farquhar, Chair, New Zealand Guidelines Group; Karen Evison, Portfolio Manager, Northern Operations, Public Health Operations, Public Health Directorate, Ministry of Health; Dr Ron Borland, Co-Director VicHealth (The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation) Centre for Tobacco Control, Australia; Professor John Hughes, Human Behavioral Psychopharmacology, Department of Psychology, The University of Vermont, USA; Dr Karl Fagerström, Smokers Information Center, Fagerström Consulting, Sweden. Finally, we thank all those in the tobacco control and
smoking cessation community who provided helpful comments and feedback.
Correspondence: Dr Hayden McRobbie,
Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Population Health, University of
Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1072, New Zealand. Fax: +64 (0)9
3731710; email: h.mcrobbie@ctru.auckland.ac.nz
References:
|
||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |