NZMA Home

Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries 1887-2008
Classifieds
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Copyright
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 29-June-2007, Vol 120 No 1257

Lessons from Hong Kong and other countries for outdoor smokefree areas in New Zealand?
On a recent stay in Hong Kong, one of us (NW) noted the striking success of outdoor smoking restrictions (introduced in January 20071). No smoking was observed in four smokefree parks and two smokefree beaches, during a total of eight visits to these places (in May 2007). This was despite these outdoor settings being well frequented by adults and during fine weather on all occasions. Furthermore, no cigarette butts were observed in any of these sites. The smokefree signage at the entrances to these outdoor settings was very noticeable and often included large banners (e.g. Figure 1).
Figure 1: Typical signage for an outdoor smokefree area in Hong Kong in May 2007
Hong Kong law bans smoking in the open areas of hospitals (both public and private); open areas of all schools, including university campuses; public bathing beaches; public swimming pools (pool areas and spectator stands); the Hong Kong Stadium, Hong Kong Wetland Park, and Mongkok Stadium (turf pitch areas and spectator stands); and at public transport interchanges.2
The Hong Kong Housing Authority has banned smoking in all common areas of public rental housing estates, from April 2007.3 These common areas of the large estates include ‘roads, pedestrian paths, ... gardens, play areas and sports grounds’ with ‘no more than five smoking areas on each estate,’ ... each of ‘about 5 square metres’.4
Worldwide, there are a number of jurisdictions where smoking is banned outside on beaches, in parks, playgrounds, stadiums, bus shelters, the outdoor sections of hospitality venues, and in the outdoor areas of the whole town of Calabasas, California.1,5 These smokefree areas include all Californian public playgrounds,6 and all park, sports fields, playgrounds, beaches, and bus shelters in Mosman, Sydney.7 A number of jurisdictions ban smoking near building entrances, including Washington State in the USA.8
There are three main arguments in favour of banning smoking in outdoor areas:
  • Preventing adverse role-modelling for children;
  • Preventing exposure to secondhand smoke; and
  • Reducing litter from smoking-related materials.
The example of smoking by adults is a crucial factor in youth starting smoking and quitting.9–15 Increased smokefree areas change norms about smoking, and reinforce to smokers and youth the severe risks from tobacco use.16
The New Zealand Government’s Framework for Reducing Smoking Initiation in Aotearoa-New Zealand17 has increased the policy emphasis in New Zealand on reducing the exposure of children to smoking behaviour, in order to reduce smoking uptake. One avenue to decrease this exposure is the introduction of smokefree playgrounds, parks, and other outdoor areas.
Besides the risks from the example of smoking by others, the evidence base around hazardous air pollution from outdoor smoking in various settings is also growing. This work indicates levels of fine particulates (PM2.5) that are sometimes at hazardous levels.18–21 There has also been preliminary work on elevated PM2.5 levels in outdoor smoking areas of hospitality venues in New Zealand.22
Smoking-related materials (particularly cigarette butts) are also leading components of litter.23 Furthermore, discarded butts can constitute a fire-hazard in some outdoor settings.
There is a need to expand the evidence base, for example by conducting evaluations of the outdoor smoking restrictions that have already been introduced in New Zealand. These currently include the grounds of all schools, some council-owned parks (e.g in South Taranaki and Upper Hutt), the grounds of some hospitals, stadiums, and a university campus (Massey).
Research is also desirable to clarify the potential benefits of reducing outdoor smoking in areas frequented by children (e.g. parks) as part of the long-term denormalisation of smoking and to avoid role-modelling of smoking behaviour.
But while more research is clearly desirable, a precautionary approach suggests a need for further restrictions now, especially for parks and sports fields used by children and for semi-enclosed smoking areas in hospitality settings. We encourage the Cancer Society and the Health Sponsorship Council to continue their work with councils for smokefree parks. There is also a need for additional civil society action to get councils to adopt smokefree by-laws for hospitality settings.
Acknowledgements: This work was partly completed within the “Reducing Smoking Around Children” research project, funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Competing interests: The authors have all previously undertaken work for the Ministry of Health and/or non-governmental agencies working to improve tobacco control.
Nick Wilson, George Thomson, Richard Edwards
Department of Public Health
University of Otago, Wellington
(nick.wilson@otago.ac.nz)
References:
  1. Wikipedia. List of smoking bans. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_smoking_bans 2007.
  2. Hong Kong Digest. Hong Kong passes anti-smoking law. New York: Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office, 2006:October 2006.
  3. Hong Kong Housing Authority. Smoking Strictly Prohibited in Public Housing Estates. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Housing Authority, 2007.
  4. Simpson D. Hong Kong, China: no smoking in housing estates. Tob Control. 2007;16:167.
  5. Roberts S. Officials in California town say smoking ban is working. Wall Street Journal 2006; 30 May.
  6. San Francisco Chronicle Sacramento Bureau. New state law bans smoking on playgrounds, sets $100 fine. San Francisco Chronicle 2001; 9 August.
  7. Mosman Council. Smoking in Public Places. Sydney: Mosman Council, 2007. http://www.mosman.nsw.gov.au/policies/smoking.pdf
  8. Washington State Legislature. RCW 70.160.075: Smoking prohibited within twenty-five feet of public places or places of employment Olympia, WA Washington State Legislature, 2005.
  9. Darling H, Reeder A. Is exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke in the home related to daily smoking among youth? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27:655–6.
  10. Farkas A, Gilpin E, Distefan J, Pierce J. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 1999;8:261–5.
  11. Gilpin E, White M, Farkas A, Pierce J. Home smoking restrictions: which smokers have them and how they are associated with smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1:153–62.
  12. Proescholdbell RJ, Chassin L, MacKinnon DP. Home smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking. Nicotine Tob Res. 2000;2:159–67.
  13. Scragg R, Laugesen M, Robinson E. Parental smoking and related behaviours influence adolescent tobacco smoking: results from the 2001 New Zealand national survey of 4th form students. N Z Med J. 2003;116(1187). http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1187/707
  14. Wakefield M, Chaloupka F, Kaufman N, et al. Effect of restrictions on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000;321:333–7.
  15. Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, et al. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15 Suppl 3:iii42–50.
  16. Conley Thomson C, Siegel M, Winickoff J, et al. Household smoking bans and adolescents' perceived prevalence of smoking and social acceptability of smoking. Prev Med. 2005;41:349–56.
  17. Health Sponsorship Council. Framework for Reducing Smoking Initiation in Aotearoa-New Zealand. Wellington: Health Sponsorship Council, 2005.
  18. Klepeis NE, Ott WR, Switzer P. Real-time measurement of outdoor tobacco smoke particles. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007;57:522–34.
  19. Naeher L, St Helen G, Pearce J, et al. Second hand smoke outside of restaurants and bars in downtown Athens, Georgia [Conference Abstract 4580 pA565, 22 May]. San Francisco: American Thoracic Society International Conference, 2007.
  20. Travers M, Higbee C, Hyland A. Vancouver Island Outdoor Smoking Area Air Monitoring Study 2007. Buffalo, New York: Roswell Park Cancer Institute, 2007.
  21. Kennedy R, Sendzik T, Elton-Marshall T, et al. Tobacco smoke pollution in outdoor hospitality settings – A Four-Season Study (the results of simultaneous PM2.5 monitoring on patios and inside bars) [Poster Presentation]. Austin, Texas: 13th Annual Society for Nicotine and Tobacco Research Conference (21-24 February, 2007), 2007.
  22. Wilson N, Edwards R, Maher A, et al. National smokefree law in New Zealand improves air quality inside bars, pubs and restaurants. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:85. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/85
  23. Novotny TE, Zhao F. Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use. Tob Control. 1999;8:75–80.
     
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals