![]() |
|||
|
|||
Lessons from Hong Kong and other countries for
outdoor smokefree areas in New Zealand?
On a recent stay in Hong Kong, one of us (NW) noted the
striking success of outdoor smoking restrictions (introduced in January
20071). No smoking was observed in four
smokefree parks and two smokefree beaches, during a total of eight visits to
these places (in May 2007). This was despite these outdoor settings being well
frequented by adults and during fine weather on all occasions. Furthermore, no
cigarette butts were observed in any of these sites. The smokefree signage at
the entrances to these outdoor settings was very noticeable and often included
large banners (e.g. Figure 1).
Figure 1: Typical signage for an outdoor
smokefree area in Hong Kong in May 2007
![]() Hong Kong law bans smoking in the open areas of hospitals
(both public and private); open areas of all schools, including university
campuses; public bathing beaches; public swimming pools (pool areas and
spectator stands); the Hong Kong Stadium, Hong Kong Wetland Park, and Mongkok
Stadium (turf pitch areas and spectator stands); and at public transport
interchanges.2
The Hong Kong Housing Authority has banned smoking in all
common areas of public rental housing estates, from April
2007.3 These common areas of the large estates
include ‘roads, pedestrian paths, ... gardens, play areas and sports
grounds’ with ‘no more than five smoking areas on each
estate,’ ... each of ‘about 5 square
metres’.4
Worldwide, there are a number of jurisdictions where smoking
is banned outside on beaches, in parks, playgrounds, stadiums, bus shelters, the
outdoor sections of hospitality venues, and in the outdoor areas of the whole
town of Calabasas, California.1,5 These
smokefree areas include all Californian public
playgrounds,6 and all park, sports fields,
playgrounds, beaches, and bus shelters in Mosman,
Sydney.7 A number of jurisdictions ban smoking
near building entrances, including Washington State in the
USA.8
There are three main arguments in favour of banning smoking
in outdoor areas:
The example
of smoking by adults is a crucial factor in youth starting smoking and
quitting.9–15 Increased smokefree areas
change norms about smoking, and reinforce to smokers and youth the severe risks
from tobacco use.16
The New Zealand Government’s Framework for
Reducing Smoking Initiation in Aotearoa-New
Zealand17 has increased the policy
emphasis in New Zealand on reducing the exposure of children to smoking
behaviour, in order to reduce smoking uptake. One avenue to decrease this
exposure is the introduction of smokefree playgrounds, parks, and other outdoor
areas.
Besides the risks from the example of smoking by others, the
evidence base around hazardous air pollution from outdoor smoking in various
settings is also growing. This work indicates levels of fine particulates
(PM2.5) that are sometimes at hazardous
levels.18–21 There has also been
preliminary work on elevated PM2.5 levels in
outdoor smoking areas of hospitality venues in New
Zealand.22
Smoking-related materials (particularly cigarette butts) are
also leading components of litter.23
Furthermore, discarded butts can constitute a fire-hazard in some outdoor
settings.
There is a need to expand the evidence base, for example by
conducting evaluations of the outdoor smoking restrictions that have already
been introduced in New Zealand. These currently include the grounds of all
schools, some council-owned parks (e.g in South Taranaki and Upper Hutt), the
grounds of some hospitals, stadiums, and a university campus (Massey).
Research is also desirable to clarify the potential benefits
of reducing outdoor smoking in areas frequented by children (e.g. parks) as part
of the long-term denormalisation of smoking and to avoid role-modelling of
smoking behaviour.
But while more research is clearly desirable, a
precautionary approach suggests a need for further restrictions now, especially
for parks and sports fields used by children and for semi-enclosed smoking areas
in hospitality settings. We encourage the Cancer Society and the Health
Sponsorship Council to continue their work with councils for smokefree parks.
There is also a need for additional civil society action to get councils to
adopt smokefree by-laws for hospitality settings.
Acknowledgements: This work was partly
completed within the “Reducing Smoking Around Children”
research project, funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Competing interests: The authors have
all previously undertaken work for the Ministry of Health and/or
non-governmental agencies working to improve tobacco control.
Nick Wilson, George Thomson, Richard Edwards
Department of Public Health University of Otago, Wellington (nick.wilson@otago.ac.nz) References:
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |