![]() |
|||
|
|||
Presidential Address: Richard John Seddon tribute and
fake doctors under fire
Published in the N Z Med J
1907;5(22):43–57.
Since our last annual meeting, death has taken from our
midst two dominant personalities whom this colony could ill afford to
lose—The Hon. Richard John Seddon, whose zealous and self-sacrificing work
for the welfare of the people included much that was of interest to the medical
profession, and Dr. Duncan McGregor, the late, Inspector of Hospitals, in whom
the highest scholastic attainments were combined in uncommon degree with shrewd
practical knowledge of men and things. The medical profession lament the loss of
these strong, brave men, and sincerely sympathise with their sorrowiug
relatives.
The title of my address this evening is—
THE MEDICAL SERVICE OF NEW ZEALAND. Being a review and criticism of the way in which the people
of this colony are catered for, in regard to the prevention and cure of the
various ills that flesh is heir to.
The duly qualified physicians and surgeons at present on the
New Zealand Register, and who are actually practising in the colony, number
roughly 600. The population of New Zealand is in round numbers 960,000, so that
we have here one doctor to about every 1,600 of the inhabitants. A glance
through the Register of the practitioners, will indicate that New Zealand now
possesses a medical service decidedly ample in quantity, and on the whole, sound
in quality.
By a recent act of Parliament, the portals of registration
in New Zealand have been very properly narrowed. No one can now register as a
medical practitioner who has not received the diploma of a school giving a
complete modern medical education.
The curriculum of a modern medical school necessitates a
minimum of five years of diligent study of the theory and practice of the
various departments of medicine, and a large proportion of’ the
practitioners spend six or seven years in thoroughly equipping themselves for
their profession. It is fair then, that unregistered practitioners, men with no
proper medical education, men without genuine diplomas, or with diplomas granted
for financial consideration by some irresponsible body of charlatans, or puesdo
[sic] scientists, is it fair that such men should be permitted to call
themselves doctors, to delude the public into thinking that they are medical
doctors, and to enter unjustly into competition with registered medical
practitioners who have been obliged to spend so much time and so much money on
education.
I am not speaking just at this moment of the ordinary quack.
He comes under a different category, and I shall refer to him presently. He does
little or no harm to the duly qualified medical practitioner. But the man who
poses before the public as a qualified medical practitioner, when he is
absolutely unregisterable as such, enters unfairly into competition with
doctors; and the medical profession should demand that so monstrous a wrong to
them and to the public should no longer be tolerated.
In the present state of the law there is no protection from
this sort of thing. Actually the names of unqualified, unregistered individuals
are printed on the telephone subscribers list, on the first page, amongst the
doctors. The Council of the New Zealand Branch recently called the attention of
the Postmaster-general and Minister of Telegraphs to this impropriety, and
politely requested that the names of unregistered men should not be printed on
the first page of the telephone list with the regular qualified practitioners.
The Postmaster-general, after due consideration, replied that he is not prepared
at present, to exclude the names of unregistered men from the telephone list of
medical practitioners.
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |