![]() |
|||
|
|||
Highly hazardous air quality associated with smoking
in cars: New Zealand pilot study
Secondhand smoke (SHS) is a complex
mixture of over 3800 gaseous and particulate components, exposure to which
causes a range of serious adverse health effects in children, adults, and
pregnant women.1 The 2003 Smokefree
Environments Amendment Act resulted in most indoor workplaces being smokefree.
However, an area of concern in New Zealand is the persisting exposure of
non-smokers, particularly children, to SHS in homes, cars, and other settings.
This is particularly a problem for Māori and low socioeconomic status
populations.2,3
A recent New Zealand study found
that in cars where smoking was occurring, it was commonly (24%) in the presence
of other occupants. The proportion of cars with smoking occupants was higher in
more deprived areas.4A marker that is commonly
used to measure SHS levels is fine particulates
(PM2.5). Methods for measuring air quality in
cars using portable real time monitors have recently been
reported.5,6 These studies recorded very high
levels of PM2.5 during and after smoking,
particularly when the windows were closed. We carried out a pilot study to
investigate levels of PM2.5 in cars in New
Zealand under different conditions of smoking, ventilation and speed of travel.
The study had Category B Ethical Approval through the University of Otago review
process.
The principal investigator (RE) drove the car, (a Honda
Odyssey station wagon, in which no smoking had previously occurred for at least
10 months) while another investigator (NP) smoked cigarettes
(‘lights’ brand) under specified conditions. Data was collected
using a TSI SidePak AM510 (TSI, Inc, St Paul, USA) portable
real time air quality monitor to record average levels of respirable
particulates (PM2.5) over 1-minute periods. The
instrument was used according to a protocol modified from one developed for a US
study,7 and as used in a UK study by RE
(further details of the data collection methods are available in these
publications).8 The SidePak was
located on a child’s booster seat in the rear of the car with a length of
Tygon™ tubing attached to the inlet and the other end left protruding at
approximately the height of the nose of a small child sitting in the back of the
car.
We began by monitoring ambient air for 10 minutes at a busy
traffic intersection (Basin Reserve, Wellington) at 5pm (rush hour) in September
2006. We then drove the car around suburban areas of Wellington at a mean speed
of 50 kph. The route was chosen to minimise stops at intersections and traffic
lights. The fan and air-conditioning was switched off throughout the monitoring
period.
Whilst driving, three cigarettes were smoked, the first with
the passenger’s window fully open and cigarette held outside car between
puffs; the second with the passenger window open half way and cigarette held
inside the car in between puffs; and the third was smoked with all windows
closed. The weather was sunny throughout, with a light to moderate breeze.
Figure 1. shows the levels of fine particulates
(PM2.5) while the first two cigarettes were
smoked. Figure 2 shows the particulate levels while the third cigarette was
smoked with the windows closed, and the subsequent levels over the next
hour
Figure 1. Particulate
(PM2.5) levels
(μg/m3) during smoking of cigarettes in a
moving car with passenger window wholly or half open
![]() Mean levels during smoking the smoking first cigarette with
the window fully down were 168.5 μg/m3,
and were 143 μg/m3 during smoking of the
second cigarette with the window half down.
Mean PM2.5 levels during
smoking of the first cigarette were 199
μg/m3, (peak 217
μg/m3), during the second cigarette 162
μg/m3 (peak 181
μg/m3), and during the third 2926
μg/m3 (peak 3645
μg/m3).
Fifteen minutes after the third cigarette was extinguished,
PM2.5 levels were 631
μg/m3, and did not return to the baseline
level until almost 40 minutes after the cigarette had been put out.
PM2.5 levels observed during
smoking were many times higher than in the ambient air (3-4
μg/m3), even next to a busy traffic
roundabout. For comparison, the mean daily PM2.5
levels in Auckland during 1998–2001 were 11.0 μg/m (range 2.1 to 37.6
μg/m).9 Compared to the poorest air
quality days in Auckland, PM2.5 levels in the car
during smoking were about five times worse with a window wholly or partially
open, and up to 100 times worse with the windows closed.
Figure 2. Particulate
(PM2.5) levels
(μg/m3) during smoking of a cigarette in a
moving car with all windows closed (and no other ventilation
operating)
![]() The World Health Organization guidelines for annual mean and
24 hour mean PM2.5 levels are 10
μg/m3 and 25
μg/m3
respectively.10 Some of the highest indoor
levels of particulates due to SHS are found in pubs and bars where smoking is
allowed. For example, a UK study found mean PM2.5
levels 285 μg/m3 over 30 minutes of
monitoring in the evening (maximum 1400
μg/m3) in 64 pubs across north-west
England.8
Air quality in the car with the window partially or wholly
down was therefore similar to that found in a typical smoky pub, whereas when
smoking occurred with the window closed it was at least twice as bad as even the
smokiest pub.
The results confirm that unacceptably high levels of air
pollution result from smoking in cars, and show that non-smokers are heavily
exposed to SHS in this setting. The findings validate the public health
rationale for the current Health Sponsorship Council mass media campaign in New
Zealand that encourages smokers to protect their children from the harms of
secondhand smoke by not smoking in their car, even when they are alone (http://www.secondhandsmoke.co.nz/media/cars.shtml).
The findings also suggest that laws to make cars smokefree,
particularly when children are present (as have been adopted in other
jurisdictions such as in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Puerto Rico) should be
explored.
Acknowledgements: We thank Mark Travers of
Roswell Park Cancer Institute (New York, USA) for loaning the portable aerosol
monitor. We are also grateful to Kiri Milne; Marija Vidovich, and
Melonie Martin. There was no external agency funding for this air quality
study.
Richard Edwards, Nick Wilson
Senior Lecturers Nevil Pierse
Research Fellow Department of Public Health
Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago Wellington (richard.edwards@otago.ac.nz) References:
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |