NZMA Home

Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries 1887-2008
Classifieds
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Copyright
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 27-October-2006, Vol 119 No 1244

Highly hazardous air quality associated with smoking in cars: New Zealand pilot study
Secondhand smoke (SHS) is a complex mixture of over 3800 gaseous and particulate components, exposure to which causes a range of serious adverse health effects in children, adults, and pregnant women.1 The 2003 Smokefree Environments Amendment Act resulted in most indoor workplaces being smokefree. However, an area of concern in New Zealand is the persisting exposure of non-smokers, particularly children, to SHS in homes, cars, and other settings. This is particularly a problem for Māori and low socioeconomic status populations.2,3
A recent New Zealand study found that in cars where smoking was occurring, it was commonly (24%) in the presence of other occupants. The proportion of cars with smoking occupants was higher in more deprived areas.4A marker that is commonly used to measure SHS levels is fine particulates (PM2.5). Methods for measuring air quality in cars using portable real time monitors have recently been reported.5,6 These studies recorded very high levels of PM2.5 during and after smoking, particularly when the windows were closed. We carried out a pilot study to investigate levels of PM2.5 in cars in New Zealand under different conditions of smoking, ventilation and speed of travel. The study had Category B Ethical Approval through the University of Otago review process.
The principal investigator (RE) drove the car, (a Honda Odyssey station wagon, in which no smoking had previously occurred for at least 10 months) while another investigator (NP) smoked cigarettes (‘lights’ brand) under specified conditions. Data was collected using a TSI SidePak AM510 (TSI, Inc, St Paul, USA) portable real time air quality monitor to record average levels of respirable particulates (PM2.5) over 1-minute periods. The instrument was used according to a protocol modified from one developed for a US study,7 and as used in a UK study by RE (further details of the data collection methods are available in these publications).8 The SidePak was located on a child’s booster seat in the rear of the car with a length of Tygon™ tubing attached to the inlet and the other end left protruding at approximately the height of the nose of a small child sitting in the back of the car.
We began by monitoring ambient air for 10 minutes at a busy traffic intersection (Basin Reserve, Wellington) at 5pm (rush hour) in September 2006. We then drove the car around suburban areas of Wellington at a mean speed of 50 kph. The route was chosen to minimise stops at intersections and traffic lights. The fan and air-conditioning was switched off throughout the monitoring period.
Whilst driving, three cigarettes were smoked, the first with the passenger’s window fully open and cigarette held outside car between puffs; the second with the passenger window open half way and cigarette held inside the car in between puffs; and the third was smoked with all windows closed. The weather was sunny throughout, with a light to moderate breeze.
Figure 1. shows the levels of fine particulates (PM2.5) while the first two cigarettes were smoked. Figure 2 shows the particulate levels while the third cigarette was smoked with the windows closed, and the subsequent levels over the next hour
Figure 1. Particulate (PM2.5) levels (μg/m3) during smoking of cigarettes in a moving car with passenger window wholly or half open
Mean levels during smoking the smoking first cigarette with the window fully down were 168.5 μg/m3, and were 143 μg/m3 during smoking of the second cigarette with the window half down.
Mean PM2.5 levels during smoking of the first cigarette were 199 μg/m3, (peak 217 μg/m3), during the second cigarette 162 μg/m3 (peak 181 μg/m3), and during the third 2926 μg/m3 (peak 3645 μg/m3).
Fifteen minutes after the third cigarette was extinguished, PM2.5 levels were 631 μg/m3, and did not return to the baseline level until almost 40 minutes after the cigarette had been put out.
PM2.5 levels observed during smoking were many times higher than in the ambient air (3-4 μg/m3), even next to a busy traffic roundabout. For comparison, the mean daily PM2.5 levels in Auckland during 1998–2001 were 11.0 μg/m (range 2.1 to 37.6 μg/m).9 Compared to the poorest air quality days in Auckland, PM2.5 levels in the car during smoking were about five times worse with a window wholly or partially open, and up to 100 times worse with the windows closed.
Figure 2. Particulate (PM2.5) levels (μg/m3) during smoking of a cigarette in a moving car with all windows closed (and no other ventilation operating)
The World Health Organization guidelines for annual mean and 24 hour mean PM2.5 levels are 10 μg/m3 and 25 μg/m3 respectively.10 Some of the highest indoor levels of particulates due to SHS are found in pubs and bars where smoking is allowed. For example, a UK study found mean PM2.5 levels 285 μg/m3 over 30 minutes of monitoring in the evening (maximum 1400 μg/m3) in 64 pubs across north-west England.8
Air quality in the car with the window partially or wholly down was therefore similar to that found in a typical smoky pub, whereas when smoking occurred with the window closed it was at least twice as bad as even the smokiest pub.
The results confirm that unacceptably high levels of air pollution result from smoking in cars, and show that non-smokers are heavily exposed to SHS in this setting. The findings validate the public health rationale for the current Health Sponsorship Council mass media campaign in New Zealand that encourages smokers to protect their children from the harms of secondhand smoke by not smoking in their car, even when they are alone (http://www.secondhandsmoke.co.nz/media/cars.shtml).
The findings also suggest that laws to make cars smokefree, particularly when children are present (as have been adopted in other jurisdictions such as in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Puerto Rico) should be explored.
Acknowledgements: We thank Mark Travers of Roswell Park Cancer Institute (New York, USA) for loaning the portable aerosol monitor. We are also grateful to Kiri Milne; Marija Vidovich, and Melonie Martin. There was no external agency funding for this air quality study.
Richard Edwards, Nick Wilson
Senior Lecturers
Nevil Pierse
Research Fellow
Department of Public Health
Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago
Wellington
(richard.edwards@otago.ac.nz)
References:
  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, and Human Services; 2006.
  2. Gillespie J, Milne K, Wilson N. Secondhand smoke in New Zealand homes and cars: exposure, attitudes and behaviours in 2004. N Z Med J. 2005;118(1227). URL: http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/118-1227/1782
  3. Whitlock G, MacMahon S, Vander Hoorn S, et al. Association of environmental tobacco smoke exposure with socio-economic status in a population of 7725 New Zealanders. Tob Control. 1998;7:276-280.
  4. Martin J, George R, Andrews K, et al. Observed smoking in cars: A methodology and differences by socio-economic area. Tob Control 2006;15:409–11.
  5. Rees VW, Connolly GN. Children's exposure to secondhand smoke in private cars: developing policy from empirical science. 13th World Conference on Tobacco or Health; 2006 July 12th–15th; Washington DC.
  6. Sendzik T, Fong G, Travers M, Hyland A. The hazard of tobacco smoke pollution in cars: evidence from an air quality monitoring study. 13th World Conference on Tobacco or Health; 2006 July 12th–15th; Washington DC.
  7. Travers M, Cummings KM, Hyland A, et al. Indoor air quality in hospitality venues before and after the implementation of a Clean Indoor Air Law - Western New York, 2003. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:1038–41.
  8. Edwards R, Hasselholdt CP, Hargreaves K, et al. Levels of second hand smoke in pubs and bars by deprivation and food-serving status: a cross-sectional study from North West England. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:42.
  9. Barnett AG, Williams GM, Schwartz J, et al. Air pollution and child respiratory health: a case-crossover study in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:1272–8.
  10. World Health Organization. WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005. Summary of risk assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
     
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals