![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
New Zealand cancer patients should have access to
erythropoietin treatment
John Carter, Jennifer Clay
BackgroundErythropoietin is a 166 amino acid glycosolated polypeptide
produced by the kidneys and liver. There is a good understanding of the
biochemistry and physiology of this natural hormone.1 While the cause of anaemia
in cancer patients is often multifactorial, a significant factor is a relative
decrease in erythropoietin production in these patients 2.
The encoding gene for erythropoietin is on the long arm of
chromosome 7 (7q21). It was the first haematopoietic growth factor to be cloned
(1985) and, 20years ago, the efficacy of erythropoietin in correcting the
anaemia in renal dialysis patients was documented.3 Soon afterwards its use in
solid tumours and haematological malignancies was being reported.4,5 Subsequent
to these early studies, much literature has confirmed both the efficacy and
safety of erythropoietin in treating the anaemia found in cancer patients.
Anaemia is common in patients with malignancy. A large
prospective study in 24 European countries studied 15,000 cancer patients and
found 67% had anaemia either at diagnosis or during treatment. Of these
patients, only 40% ever received treatment for the anaemia (at a mean Hb level
of 97g/L). A strong correlation between quality of life (QOL) and anaemia was
found in that study.6 Indeed, the relationship between QOL and anaemia is
significant.7 Patients place great importance on QOL issues, and of these
issues, fatigue (which correlates well with the degree of anaemia) is given the
highest rating.8
A large (2370 patients) prospective study showed a strong
correlation between an erythropoietin-induced rise in haemoglobin and QOL in
community-treated cancer patients.9 Functional improvement is seen up to an
haemoglobin level of 120g/L; subcutaneous injections are acceptable to patients
with cancer if they perceive the treatment as effective 10.
The ability of erythropoietin to improve the anaemia of
malignancy has been studied in many randomised trials, and a meta-analysis of 19
trials conducted between 1993 and 2001 showed the effect of erythropoietin in
reducing transfusion requirements with an OR = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.33–0.5
(p<0.00001). By using a cumulative meta-analysis methodology, these authors
demonstrated that a statistically significant effect of erythropoietin had been
demonstrated by 1995.11
There is a significant literature documenting the
relationship between anaemia, tumour hypoxia, response to
chemotherapy/radiotherapy, and survival in both haematological and solid tumours
in man and experimental animals.12 From these studies, it can be concluded that
the use of erythropoietin to raise haemoglobin levels (and reduce tissue
hypoxia) may improve patient outcomes to treatment.
Cost-effectiveness studies are difficult for this treatment.
A full evaluation of the societal costs of transfusion therapy has not been done
in New Zealand, and dollar measurements of QOL gain are debated.13 Despite these
problems, a US study demonstrated a 20% improvement in cost-effectiveness for
erythropoietin use over 4 months in cancer patients.14
While approximately 60% of patients will respond to
erythropoietin with a rise of haemoglobin >20g/L, it would be cost-effective
to be able to recognise non-responders early. An accurate prediction of response
is possible within a few weeks of starting therapy by using assays for
erythropoietin, transferrin receptor and reticulocyte and haemoglobin response.
Such monitoring should be incorporated into treatment protocols and costing
studies.15
As a result of data confirming the efficacy and safety of
erythropoietin in treating anaemia in cancer patients, evidence-based clinical
guidelines have been produced by British/European and American Professional
groups.16,17 New Zealand clinicians are unable to provide care to cancer
patients at the levels recommended in these standards due to funding
constraints.
CommentAnaemia is common in patients with cancer and results in
significant morbidity. It is under-treated, and reliance on blood transfusions
as therapy is associated with significant problems.
Erythropoietin is a safe and effective agent for increasing
haemoglobin levels in the majority of patients with cancer. In those patients
that respond, prospective, randomised, controlled trials show a significant
improvement in formal quality of life scores, reduced use of blood transfusions,
and possibly improved tumour response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, thus
leading to longer survival. Patients place a high utility on treatment that
improves quality of life, and are increasingly asking clinicians for access to
this treatment.
The reduced need for blood transfusions that would result
from the funding of erythropoietin therapy is important. One of the guiding
principles of the New Zealand Blood Service is to minimise waste of the blood
donor’s gift. Similarly, when synthetic medications can substitute for
donor blood they should (in principle) be used.
As erythropoietin is not funded for use in cancer patients
in New Zealand, very few patients receive this agent. It is possible to apply to
the Hospital Exceptional Circumstances Panel for approval for use in a specific
patient (with payment coming from the hospital budget). This process is
time-consuming and frustrating for clinicians who therefore seldom proceed down
this pathway. The outcomes of such applications are inconsistent (records on
file). The combination of a limited number of applications and variable outcomes
means there is not uniform access of patients to this treatment. This is
inconsistent with Government policy for healthcare in New Zealand that places
great emphasis on equity of care across the Public Health System.
Evidence-based Best Practice Guidelines from several
countries, including Great Britain, recommend the use of erythropoietin in the
management of cancer patients. As a result of a failure to fund this agent, New
Zealand is failing to deliver patient care to the standard being delivered by
countries our Ministry of Health usually choses to benchmark against.
We consider it is appropriate for PHARMAC to consider
expanding access to erythropoietin to patients with cancer.
Disclosures:
None.
Author information:
John M Carter, Associate Professor, Wellington School of Medicine and
Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington; Jennifer Clay, House Surgeon,
Wellington Blood and Cancer Centre, Wellington Hospital, Wellington
Correspondence:
Associate Professor John Carter, Wellington School of Medicine and Health
Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington. Fax (04) 385 5930;
email: vanness@orcon.net.nz
References:
|
||||||||||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |