NZMA Home

Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries 1887-2006
Classifieds
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Copyright
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 19-May-2006, Vol 119 No 1234

After hours healthcare for older patients in New Zealand
Anne Eastwood, Anthony Dowell
Abstract
Aims To explore patterns of general practice after hours service use in different age groups, and to identify possible reasons for any differences between older and younger people in their use of after hours services.
Methods Attendance data from two after hours clinics (AHCs) and the local hospital emergency department (ED) for 2002 were collected and analysed statistically.
Results Older people, especially the “young-old” (aged 65 to 74) used after hours health centres at a lower rate than younger adults. Older people attended the ED at a higher rate than younger adults, except for the “young-old” who attended at a similar rate. European ethnicity, symptoms resulting from an accident, and increasing severity of the illness were positively correlated with ED attendance.
Conclusions Older people presented to after hours clinics less than would be expected, especially given their greater morbidity. Older people attended the Hutt Valley ED after hours at a higher rate than younger people, but at a lower rate than in normal hours. Older people were sicker on arrival at ED (especially after hours) than younger people. These results have implications for service delivery and also equity issues as they affect older people.

Most research and policy documents relating to the health of older people focus on chronic and degenerative conditions, rather than access to, and use of, health services.1–3 Older people suffer acute health problems and may benefit more from treatment than younger people. Campbell4 refers to the “threshold effect” in which many older people are close to a point where further small losses of function will seriously affect their independence. Thus it is important to determine how older people use acute care services and whether there are barriers to their access.
Little research into ED and after hours clinic-use exists, and most of it is not specific to older people and is conducted outside New Zealand.5,6. In the UK, Foster et al7 found that a stoical attitude towards health, difficulties with transport, reluctance to go out at night, and a preference for a familiar doctor were factors contributing to a reluctance amongst the elderly to seek after hours medical care.
The absence of accurate New Zealand prevalence data for attendance at after hours services in this older age group indicated a need to explore this issue. . There was also anecdotal evidence from the Hutt Valley area of New Zealand that some older people were deferring seeking healthcare when they became unwell after hours, with resulting adverse consequences for their long-term health.

Methods

The research was conducted in the Hutt Valley where 11% of the 131,000 residents were aged 65 and over (compared with 12.9% of the New Zealand population) and where there is a somewhat higher standard of living than the New Zealand average.8–10 Existing sources revealed that Lower Hutt was relatively under-doctored, with Wainuiomata having a particularly low number of general practitioners.11 The leading causes of hospitalisation and mortality for the Hutt Valley were similar to those nationally.11 The Hutt Valley District Health Board (HVDHB) had higher avoidable morbidity rates for 65 to 74 year olds than many other DHBs.3
Older age was defined as 65 years and over. This is consistent with New Zealand statistical data, the age of eligibility for National Superannuation, and much of the published research. “After Hours” was defined as between 1730 and 0800 hours.
Data was obtained for the year 2002, from two after hours clinics (AHCs). Information was gathered from MedTech 32 software using “Query Builder”. All adult attendances were captured and broken down by gender, with the elderly group in 10-year age bands (65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85 and over).
Information was available from all visits to the Hutt Hospital Emergency Department (ED) in 2002. The data was entered into SPSS version 10 for analysis. Chi-squared tests of association or two-tailed z tests for comparing rates13 were carried out on selected variables. ED figures include all non-elective, non-obstetric admissions to the hospital. Patients who had been referred by a GP were therefore excluded. Not all patients who saw a GP after hours were captured, since two practices undertook their own after hours care at that time. Overall, these practices, with a combined practice population of 30,000, have a similar combined age/sex profile to the rest of the Hutt Valley.

Results

Attendance rates were reviewed from 38,979 AHC visits (comprising 34,371 visits from 15 to 64 year olds, and 4608 from those aged 65 and older),and 24,065 ED attendances (comprising 18,821 visits from 15 to 64 year olds, and 5244 from those aged 65 and older).
Attendance rates at the after hours clinics were significantly greater for older people (≥65 years) and for women. Meanwhile at after hours EDs, attendance rates for older people were greater and, unlike after hours clinics, rates for men were greater than for women. (Table 1)
The lowest AHC attendances were in the 65 to 74 year age group, at 248 per 1000 for men and 270 per 1000 for women. Modelling the relationship between after hours attendance rates and age group, gender and place of attendance using a Poisson regression showed that (compared to the youngest age group) this decrease was significant (p<0.001).
Figure 1 shows the arrival time patterns for older and younger people. Although the shapes of the graphs are similar, there is a significant difference in the pattern of arrival over time, with older people more likely to attend in the middle of the day and less likely to attend at night. (χ²=200.0, df=11, p<0.001).
Figure 1. Time of ED arrival by age group
A higher proportion of ED attendances by older people arrived there by ambulance after hours (63.5%) than in normal hours (47.9%) (χ²=118.4,df=1, p<0.001.). There was a significant increase in the proportion of attendances arriving by ambulance with age, with 36.0%, 50.1%, and 68.0% of older people in the three age groups arriving by ambulance in normal hours—and 51.5%, 69.6%, and 78.1% arriving after hours (χ² for linear trend=248.1,df=1, p<0.001). In 2002, 23% of all arrivals at Hutt Hospital ED came by ambulance.
Although the admission rate is an index of the severity of the presenting complaints in an age cohort, it can be influenced by factors such as the availability of beds and social circumstances. The rates of admission from ED are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Admission rates by age group 2002. Rates per 1000 population* (with 95% confidence limits)
Age group (years)
Normal hours (Female)
Normal hours
(Male)
After hours
(Female)
After hours
(Male)
15–64
32
30–33
32
30–34
25
24–26
24
22–25
65–74
81
72–90
92
83–103
52
46–60
62
54–70
75–84
155
142–170
214
194–235
88
78–98
131
115–148
85+
260
232–292
331
282–389
156
134–180
180
145–224
*Rates throughout are age and gender specific, based on 2001 Census figures.
Older people are significantly more likely to be admitted than younger people and the rate of admission increases with increasing age of older people. In all age groups, the proportion of admitted attendances is very similar in normal hours and after hours. Older men have higher admission rates than older women both in normal hours and after hours, but this difference is significant only in the 75 to 84-year-old age group.
On arrival at ED, patients are assigned a triage code indicating the severity of their condition, with code 1 being the most severe. Analysis by triage code showed similar trends to that by admission. For all age groups of elderly, a significantly higher (Chi-squared) proportion of ED attendances had triage codes 1 to 3 after hours than in normal hours (72% compared with 59% for age 65-74 (χ²=32.6, 1 df, p<0.001) 74% compared to 62% for age 75-84 (χ²=32.6, 1 df, p<0.001) and 70% compared with 61% for age 85+(χ²=7.1, 1df, p=0.008)).
Attendance as the result of an accident (when an ACC form was completed) was also analysed for differences between older and younger people, and for differences between after hours and normal hours.
Older men (aged 65 and older) attended ED with accidents at a rate significantly less than that of younger men (15 to 64) both in normal hours (53 per 1000 compared with 92 per 1000 (z=9.55, p<0.001)) and after hours (14 per 1000 compared with 23 per1000 (z=10.69, p<0.001)). Older women presented with injuries at higher rates than younger women, in normal hours (63 per 1000 compared to 42 per 1000 [z=9.96, p<0.001]), but there was no significant difference after hours (22 and 24 per 1000).
The elderly population of the Hutt Valley is predominantly (91%) European, but data from the three largest minority ethnic older populations (Asian 3.7%, Māori 2.8%, and Pacific 2.6%) was also obtained.
Table 3. ED attendances by older people by ethnicity and gender. Rates per 1000 population* (with 95% confidence limits)
Variable
European
Māori
Pacific
Asian
Normal Hours – Female
225
(214–236)
210
(157–280)
180
(134–246)
93
(64–135)
Normal Hours – Male
243
(231–257)
388
(307–490)
213
(149–304)
120
(83–179)
After Hours – Female
123
(116–131)
237
(181–312)
147
(105–206)
50
(30–83)
After Hours – Male
137
(127–147)
224
(165–304)
234
(166–329)
115
(79–168)
*Rates are specific to ethnic group.
Older Europeans had after hours attendance rates which were significantly different from those in normal hours. After hours, Māori, and Pacific older people had significantly higher rates of admission (134 and 122 per 1000 compared with 83 for European, p<0.05; significance determined by non- overlapping 95% confidence intervals for all ethnicity data) and were assigned the highest triage codes (191 and 138 per 1000 for codes 1 to 3 respectively) compared to 93 for European (p<0.05), but in normal hours there were no significant differences.
Older Asian people presented to ED significantly less often than other ethnic groups both in normal hours and after hours, had the lowest proportion of triage codes 1 to3 (58 per 1000 in normal hours and 59 per 1000 after hours compared with 142 and 93 for European), were admitted less often (60 and 49 per 1000 compared with 140 and 83 for European) and arrived less often by ambulance (24 and 26 per 1000 compared with 114 and 85 for European). There were no significant differences between ethnic groups in their attendance with accidents after hours.
Discussion
This paper demonstrates significant differences between different age groups in their use of after hours services, raising issues for health service planners about service provision and also about what constitutes “appropriate” demand for services at any particular time of the day or night. Given the known increased rates of morbidity with increasing age the relative low presentation by “younger” old people may represent a service gap, or reflect their ability to access services during the day.
These New Zealand findings from AHCs, are consistent with previous research conducted in the U.K by Foster et al.7 Men and the “young-old” are particularly under-represented in AHC attendances. The 1996/7 NZ Health Survey14 found that the “young-old” were more likely than younger people to have attended a general practitioner (GP) at least once in the previous year and to have been frequent users of GP services. It also found that older men were only slightly less likely than older women to have visited their GP in the previous year, and were more likely to be frequent attenders. The 2002/3 NZ Health Survey15 also found high rates of GP attendance in older people. The lower attendance of the “young-old” and men at after hours clinics does not reflect the general trend in GP consultations.
Older people (especially men) presented to ED at a higher rate than younger people. This is consistent with findings in Australia16 and the UK.17 However rates for the “young-old’ are similar to those for younger people. This suggests that the low rate of consultation by the “young-old” at after hours clinics does not just represent a preference for ED. Admission rates and triage codes suggest a higher rate of serious illness in older people, particularly after hours. This was also found by Chu et al16 in Australia.
Older Europeans attended ED at much lower rates after hours than in normal hours. This trend is not seen in other ethnic groups, except for Māori men who had the highest rate of attendance in normal hours. The 2002/3 NZ Health Survey15 also found that adult Asians accessed many health services at a comparatively low rate. The tendency to use ED for accidents has been described elsewhere.18,19
A particular reluctance of the “young-old” to seek after hours care does not appear to have been described elsewhere in the international literature. The low attendance of recently retired people at after hours services may be due to the relative ease with which they can access day time healthcare. The steady increase in consultation with advancing age beyond 75 should at least partly be explained by increasing morbidity and a greater tendency to live in the care of a relative or institution, which may influence the decision to seek care.
This study did not consider outcomes. It is also not known whether the pattern of attendance of either younger or older people is “appropriate”. It may be that the lower use of after hours services by some groups of older people is appropriate, rather than representing a service gap. The definition of appropriate health service use is difficult.
The transferability of the current study’s findings to communities outside the Hutt Valley is uncertain. While this elderly population is statistically reasonably representative of the New Zealand elderly, small differences, for example in income levels (indicated by lower than average CSC holding) could be reflected in the study’s results.
The free service provided by the Wellington Free Ambulance may have had a significant effect on the use of after hours services by the Hutt Valley elderly.
Information could not be obtained from two practices providing their own after hours services. Total service use and the rates, which are based on the overall population, cannot thus be generalised to other districts in the country.
Possible reasons for the choices made by older people about accessing after hours care may include cost, transport difficulties, difficulty interpreting symptoms, and established healthcare-seeking behaviours. Given the time course of many episodes of acute illness, particularly against a background of chronic morbidity, it is possible that there is an element of stoicism by older people to “wait for normal hours”. Older people may need education and encouragement to attend after hours services and GPs and other providers cannot assume that older people will respond to acute illness in the same way as younger people.
Further qualitative information is required to interpret these findings and hence work towards appropriate levels of service provision and patient education. This will be a theme of future work.
Author information: Anne Eastwood, General Practitioner and Medical Educator, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and University of New South Wales (RACGP and UNSW), Sydney, Australia; Anthony Dowell, Professor and Head of Department, Primary Health Care and General Practice, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington
Acknowledgements: Anne Eastwood completed this research (part of a Master of General Practice degree) with support from a University of Otago Postgraduate Award. We also thank Clare Salmond (Biostatistician, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences); Donald Mackie (Clinical Head – Emergency Department, Hutt Valley District Health Board); Hutt Valley After Hours Medical Centre; and the Upper Hutt After Hours Medical Centre for their assistance.
Correspondence: Dr Anne Eastwood, NSW Refugee Health Service, PO Box 144, NSW 1871, Australia. Fax: 61 2 87780790; email: anne.eastwood@swsahs.nsw.gov.au
References:
  1. Ministry of Social Development. Briefing to the incoming minister for senior citizens. Towards lifelong participation and independence. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development; 2003. Available online URL: http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/publications/msd/briefing-to-the-incoming-minister-for-senior-citizens-2003.pdf Accessed May 2006.
  2. Ministry of Health. Health sector action to support positive aging. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2002.
  3. Ministry of Health. Health of older people in New Zealand: a statistical reference. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2002.
  4. Campbell AJ. Old age in the brave new transparent health world. N Z Med J. 1999;112:393–5.
  5. Shipman C, Payne F, Dale J, Jessopp L. Patients’ perceived benefits of and barriers to using out-of-hours primary care centres. Fam Pract. 2001;18:149–55. Available online. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?orig_db=PubMed&db=PubMed&cmd=Search&defaultField=Title+Word&term=2001[pdat]+AND+Shipman+C[author]+AND+barriers Accessed May 2006.
  6. NZHTA Report 8. Emergency Department Attendance. A critical appraisal of the key literature. Christchurch, New Zealand: NZHTA;1998. Available online URL: http://nzhta.chmeds.ac.nz/publications/nzhta8.pdf Accessed May 2006.
  7. Foster J, Dale J, Jessopp L. A qualitative study of older peoples’ views of out-of hours services. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:719–23.
  8. Statistics New Zealand. New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings 2001. Regional Summary. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 2001.
  9. Statistics New Zealand. Brochure – Lower Hutt City. Census 2001 Area Data. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand;2001. Available online URL: http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/pasfull/pasfull.nsf/web/Brochure+Lower+Hutt+City+Census+2001+Area+data Accessed May 2006.
  10. Statistics New Zealand. Brochure – Upper Hutt City. Census 2001 Area Data. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand; 2001. Available online URL: http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/pasfull/pasfull.nsf/web/Brochure+Upper+Hutt+City+Census+2001+Area+data Accessed May 2006.
  11. Hutt Valley District Health Board. Primary care service plan consultation document. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: Hutt Valley District Health Board; 2002. Available online URL: http://www.huttvalleydhb.org.nz/Document.aspx?Doc=PrimaryCareServicePlan.pdf Accessed May 2006.
  12. Hutt Valley District Health Board. District Annual Plan 2002-3. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: Hutt Valley District Health Board; 2002. Available online URL: http://www.huttvalleydhb.org.nz/Document.aspx?Doc=DistrictAnnualPlan2002-03-v8.pdf Accessed May 2006.
  13. Kirkwood B, Steine J. Essential medical statistics. Second edition. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Science; 2003.
  14. Ministry of Health. Taking the Pulse: The 1996/7 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington Ministry of Health, 1999.
  15. Ministry of Health. A Portrait of Health. Key results of the 2002/3 NZ Health Survey. Chapter 4: Health Service Utilisation. Wellington: Ministry of Health 2004. Available online URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/0/3D15E13BFE803073CC256EEB0073CFE6/$File/aportraitofhealth5.pdf Accessed May 2006.
  16. Chu K, Brown A, Pillay R. Older patients’ utilisation of emergency department resources: a cross-sectional study. Aust Health Rev. 2001;24;44–52.
  17. Burns E. Older people in accident and emergency departments. Age Ageing. 2001;30(Suppl 3):3–6.
  18. Shipman C, Longhurst S, Hollenbach F, Dale J. Using after hours services: general practice or A & E. Fam Pract. 1997;14:503–9.
  19. Lewis H. Accident and emergency department utilisation: a consumer survey. N Z Med J. 1988;101:486–7.
     
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals