![]() |
|||
|
|||
Note on unskilled massage and quack rubbing
This article was written
by T. Hope Lewis (Consulting Surgeon to the Auckland and Whangarei Hospitals)
and published in the New Zealand Medical Journal 1906, Volume 5 (19),
p26
I have noticed in the course of my practice, which is mainly
surgical and gynaecological, a goodly number of cases which have been seriously
affected or materially made worse by the now almost universal practice of
rubbing as a so-called curative agent.
Medical rubbers now swarm in our city under various guises.
A patient wishing to undergo one of these rubbing-treatments makes a payment of
a lump-sum down, and of course then is desirous of having her (it is generally a
woman) money’s worth.
I once thought the treatment, at any rate, would not do any
harm, but I was sadly mistaken, and I write this short note to show a few of the
dangers—real dangers—that are likely to and do arise from the
rubbing-treatment.
The following cases speak for themselves:
A young man had an appendicitis which became chronic. He had
many attacks, and an operation was advised. He funked the knife, but allowed a
quack to “massage”—that magic word—his abdomen with a
cannon-ball. This was deliberately rolled round his abdomen each morning for so
many minutes while he lay in a special couch. He stood it as long as he could,
but at last I saw him. He was then suffering general peritonitis. A laparotomy
revealed a general agglutinative peritonitis. The lymph had been forced among
the coils of intestine; it looked exactly as if thin plaster-of-paris had been
introduced and squeezed in. He died.
A second case was one of general disseminated cancer of
peritoneum, which was ushered in with ascites, and a small two-finger incision
was made in the middle line for diagnosis. This old lady was persuaded to have
the abdomen massaged; she had it done. The way that malignant disease spread
after the rubbing commenced was appalling.
A third case was a fine strong farmer. A prize ram knocked
him down, and he fell on his great trochanter. He had a bursitis; evidently his
bursa filled with blood. Some time after he went to a famous thermal district,
and came under the treatment of a rubber. He rubbed him for some months—in
fact, he rubbed him till he had an enormous abscess over and round his
trochanter. It looked like malignancy, but an exploring needle showed how well
he had been rubbed.
One more case, the one that impelled me to write this note:
A woman aged 52, nullipara, had an abdominal tumour, and put herself under two
female rubbers. She went through the course, and then came to tell me she was
ready for the operation. She could not go on with the treatment any longer. The
rubbing had prepared her, she told me, and now the operation would be much
simpler. She was wrong. The case proved to be a large, hydrosalpinx, densely
adherent, a large intraligamentary fibroid and a fibroid uterus. The adhesions
were appalling.
Two years ago the whole abdominal and pelvic masses were
freely movable, and were more abdominal than pelvic. However, she said she had
decreased in size, and so she had. The masseusses had rubbed and pushed these
various tumours down into the pelvis, and had anchored them there with adhesions
that took me two hours to undo. In fact, I pin-holed the rectum in removing some
of them. The rubbers had in this case converted a simple operation into one of
the greatest difficulty and danger.
I do not for one moment wish to cast any reflection on
massage and skilled rubbing when properly applied, but I want to sound a note of
warning as regards this quack rubbing.
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |