![]() |
|||
|
|||
PHARMAC’s response to Tim Blackmore on the sole supply
of influenza vaccine
We think that Dr Tim Blackmore has accurately described the
issues around the interruption to New Zealand’s influenza vaccine supply
earlier this year (http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/118-1219/1596/).
As Dr Blackmore states, New Zealand has had a single
supplier for subsidised influenza vaccine for the past 8 years. PHARMAC has now
undertaken a formal review of influenza vaccine purchasing, in the wake of this
year’s experience*. As a result of this review, New Zealand will have more
than one supplier for subsidised influenza vaccine from 2006 onwards.
We are confident that Sanofi Pasteur, the world’s
largest manufacturer of influenza vaccines, is a reliable supplier. However, due
to the complexities of vaccine manufacture, we now agree that it is wise to have
at least one other supplier. For this reason, we will have at least two
companies supplying subsidised influenza vaccines in New Zealand, as was
intended in Australia this year. Sanofi Pasteur will be one of those suppliers,
with others yet to be confirmed.
Despite the confusion and delays, our monitoring to date
indicates that the uptake of subsidised influenza vaccine has been higher than
last year. We understand that there was a similar increase in the uptake of
influenza vaccine in the United States (of up to 15% in some patient groups)
following similar supply issues there with consequent adverse publicity.
Increased uptake of course does not justify the very real public anxiety around
the vaccine supply this year.
With New Zealand’s small market, a dual or multiple
supply arrangement will inevitably result in higher prices being paid for the
vaccines. While multiple supply reduces the risk of having no vaccine, it does
not remove that risk; Dr Blackmore correctly indicates that prioritisation of
any available vaccine would still be required should one supplier fail to
deliver their vaccine.
Sole supply itself is not inherently flawed. Influenza
vaccines are complex substances to manufacture, and time constraints mean that
if there are problems with a particular brand then this is difficult to redress
in time for the winter influenza season. This does not occur for most
pharmaceutical agents, and it is worth remembering that all on-patent medicines
are essentially sole supply. PHARMAC considers that tendering for off-patent
medicines is an effective way to secure the supply of pharmaceutical agents and
to achieve lower prices for generic medicines.
Conflict of
interest: All authors declare no conflicts.
Wayne McNee
Chief Executive PHARMAC Wellington Peter Moodie
Medical Director PHARMAC Wellington Sarah Schmitt
Manager, Hospital Pharmaceuticals PHARMAC Wellington Andrea Dick
Hospital Pharmaceutical Contracts Manager PHARMAC Wellington Footnote:
*The review examined
PHARMAC’s purchasing strategy regarding flu vaccine, including the use of
a sole-supply contract. PHARMAC staff held discussions with Australian officials
to examine the Australian system for purchasing the subsidised influenza
vaccine. Discussions have been held with the suppliers of influenza vaccine, and
consultation has taken place with interested parties including immunisation
groups and the College of GPs.
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |