![]() |
|||
|
|||
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD):
smoking remains the most important cause
Peter Martin, Helen Glasgow, Jane Patterson
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects 15%
(200,000) of the adult population of New Zealand. It is the fourth-most-common
cause of death after cancer, heart disease, and stroke—and accounted for
5.1% of all deaths in 1999.1 This figure is
likely to be an underestimate of the true mortality, as COPD is often a
contributing factor to deaths recorded as due to other causes.
The disease is estimated to cost more than $13
million2 in hospital costs annually, and
accounted for more than 9000 hospital discharges per year between
1997–1999. The total economic impact to the community is much greater, and
includes healthcare costs incurred outside of hospital and intangible costs such
as lost productivity from illness and premature death.
Smoking has long been recognised as the most important cause
of COPD.3 Recently, however, there has been
increasing interest in other factors which result in similar patterns of lung
damage. Chronic asthma (especially if poorly controlled) can lead to changes in
the lungs comparable to those caused by
smoking.4 Asthmatics who smoke also have
impaired response to treatment.5,6 This may
lead to less satisfactory asthma control and an accelerated decline in lung
function—an effect which is additional to that of the smoking itself.
Some workers are exposed to allergens (as well as vapours,
gas, dust, and fumes) which may be significant in the development of
COPD.7 In some countries, development of COPD
has been shown to be independent of the effects of smoking, and it is estimated
that one in five cases of COPD may be attributable to occupational
exposure.8 However at-risk occupations tend to
have high rates of smoking, and so the influence of combined factors is
difficult to determine.
There have also been studies on the effects of air pollution
on the development of chronic lung disease.9
For non-smokers, the most important form of air pollution is often
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, and this is an important factor in the
development of many diseases, including COPD.10
Genetic factors such as alpha 1-antitrypsin
deficiency are significant, and these effects are greatly accelerated if the
person smokes.
Increasing understanding about these anatomical changes,
which lead to COPD, has provided evidence which can support measures to modify
the risk factors for the disease, including techniques to optimise management of
asthma. This will reduce airway damage and remodelling, leading to chronic
impairment of lung function. This evidence also provides strong support for
effective industrial measures to reduce the effects of workplace hazards, and it
adds to the evidence about the need to reduce air pollution. However New Zealand
experiences lower levels of pollution compared to heavily industrialised
countries and does not have many of the industries which lead to severe
workplace exposures .
Therefore it must be emphasised that, in New Zealand, most
cases of COPD result from chronic smoking. Recent estimates suggest that smoking
accounts for 69% of the global burden of
COPD.11 Low levels of air pollution and lack of
heavy industry in New Zealand suggest that the contribution of smoking is likely
to be higher. This effect is completely preventable, and provides many
opportunities for intervention; smoking control remains the most effective
measure to reduce the burden of COPD.
However many patients have a low awareness of the
cause-and-effect link between smoking and COPD, and certainly a poor
understanding of the magnitude of the risk. Perhaps there may be a
well-intentioned attempt to shield patients from feelings of guilt and this can
lead to a conspiracy of silence. Whilst poorly controlled asthma can certainly
result in COPD, a more frequently encountered problem is the misdiagnosis of
COPD as asthma.4 This leads to the
inappropriate application of asthma treatments, and a failure to apply
appropriate interventions; in particular, the failure to highlight the link
between smoking and COPD and the need for smoking cessation.
Thousands of New Zealand smokers with COPD continue with
their hazardous smoking behaviour without a true understanding of the risk. It
is interesting to note that the same argument of protection of patients from
guilt is rarely applied to lung cancer, where the link is widely
acknowledged.
We are fortunate in New Zealand to have a wide range of
smoking cessation support available throughout the country, and evaluations of
these services show good success rates.12,13
Economic evaluations of smoking control interventions have demonstrated their
cost-effectiveness and highlighted the value of investing in smoking cessation
activities.
For example, a recent Ministry of Health study analysed the
cost-effectiveness of subsidised Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) made
available through the Quitline service and through the Quit Cards programme,
which provides subsidised NRT to primary healthcare
providers.14
The study included an analysis comparing the estimated costs
associated with these programmes and the health gains from long-term smoking
cessation measured in Quality-adjusted Life Years (QALYs) with an estimate of
NZ$2,942 per QALY.14,15 This compares
favourably with cost per QALY estimates for a range of other health concerns
such as NZ$3,478–$7,434 for green prescriptions, $25,000 for kidney
transplantations, and $35–$50,000 for
dialysis.14,15 Smoking cessation, which
combines support with heavily subsidised NRT, is highly
cost-effective.
We need to be vigilant in correctly diagnosing COPD. Most of
these patients will have developed the disease after a long period of smoking.
Medical practitioners need to be aware of the diagnostic problems especially in
relation to asthma. Smoking cessation is the only effective measure which will
alter the natural history of this disease, and medical practitioners have a
major role in initiating the process of assisting a smoker to quit.
The combination of simple advice and heavily subsidised NRT
is very cost-effective and needs to be easily available.
Author information:
Peter Martin, Medical Advisor; Helen Glasgow, Director, The Quit Group;
Jane Patterson, Director, Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand,
Wellington
Correspondence:
Peter Martin, Medical Advisor, The Quit Group; PO Box 12 605, Wellington. Fax:
(04) 470 7632; email: peter.martin@quit.org.nz
References:
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |