NZMA Home

Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries 1887-2008
Classifieds
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Copyright
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 17-December-2004, Vol 117 No 1207

Diabetes in children and young adults in Waikato Province, New Zealand: outcomes of care
Adrian Scott, Susie Whitcombe, David Bouchier, Peter Dunn
Abstract
Background Diabetes is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among young people. Despite improvements in technology, maintenance of good glycaemic control is hard to achieve particularly during the teenage years.
Aims To assess the outcomes of care in young people aged under age 26 years with diabetes living in New Zealand’s Waikato District Health Board (DHB) area.
Methods Audit of health records
Results Two hundred and fifty-one patients who had attended an outpatient consultation at least once in the last 3 years were identified. The mean HbA1c was 9.2% (CI 8.8–9.8). There were no gender differences. The prevalence of retinopathy was 13%, and nephropathy up to 19%. Eleven patients were taking ACE inhibitors and one person had end-stage renal failure treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Forty percent of those patients over 10 years of age had a low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of >2.6mmol/L. All of those patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were overweight, compared to 28% of those patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
Conclusions These results confirm the difficulty of achieving good glycaemic control in children and young adults. Microvascular complications are common, particularly in those of long duration. Risk factors for macrovascular disease are present from an early age, especially in those with T2DM. It is likely that these outcomes of care are typical for children and young adults with diabetes in New Zealand.

Children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) have a poor prognosis compared to their non-diabetic counterparts.1–4 It is 10 years since the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) reported the beneficial effects of tight glycaemic control in adults and adolescents.5
Unfortunately, the care of young people with diabetes is challenging and for many centres a mean HbA1c over 9% for this group is quite common (despite intensive efforts) leading some clinicians to believe that poor control is inevitable. Indeed, recent studies from Europe and Japan have illustrated the difficulties of achieving and maintaining good glycaemic control; the high prevalence of complications and the wide range of glycaemic control between centres being unrelated to patient selection or choice of insulin regimen.6–11
Nevertheless, some centres consistently have mean HbA1cs as good if not better than the Intensive arm of DCCT, without the increased risk of hypoglycaemia.12–14 Type 2 diabetes was once unknown in children but is increasingly recognised with the rise of obesity. We have reviewed our own experience of managing these young people.

Setting

Waikato District Health Board (DHB) serves approximately 9% (312,918 in the 1996 Census) of the total New Zealand population, in a largely rural setting in the North Island. Approximately 20% of the Waikato population identify themselves as Maori. An estimated 10,000 (New Zealand Ministry of Health data) of these 312,918 people have diabetes (predominantly type 2 diabetes mellitus [T2DM]), which is more common among Maori and Pacific Islanders.
Children and young people with diabetes attend the Diabetes Unit or Paediatric service in Hamilton City, or one of the outlying clinics, and are looked after by an adult endocrinologist (PD) or paediatrician (DB) and nurse educator (SW). Dietetic input is more limited and most advice comes from the nurse educator.
Children up to age 16 were always admitted at diagnosis; above that age, some patients living near the hospital may be treated as an outpatient provided they were not in ketoacidosis. Since Waikato Hospital serves a wide geographical area, most young people were admitted for at least 48 hours for initiation of treatment and initial education.
Twice daily regimens were common but now most patients aged over 7 years move swiftly to a basal bolus regimen with twice-daily Isophane and mealtime short-acting insulin, predominantly Lispro or Aspart, although some patients remain on soluble insulin. Insulin glargine was not available in New Zealand at the time of the audit.
Under that age (7 years), twice daily regimens are more common because of the difficulty of giving insulin during school hours. For about 4 years we have taught carbohydrate-counting (to facilitate insulin adjustment) and daily blood glucose testing before meals, and bedtime is encouraged. Patients going on to pumps attend a 1-week education course with a specially trained nurse specialist and dietitian.
Retinal screening is undertaken by retinal photography every 2 years from the age of 16 years. Photographs are taken with pupils dilated and graded by a consultant ophthalmologist who undertakes slit lamp examination if significant retinopathy is identified.
Foot examination is performed using either a biothesiometer or a 10 gram monofilament. Data on severe hypoglycaemia is not consistently recorded so has not been included. This audit of the outcomes of care of children and young adults with diabetes was carried out in July 2003

Methods

A Microsoft Access database holds data on all patients who are current attenders or have attended the diabetes unit in Hamilton, Waikato. Records on 315 people with diabetes born after 1st January 1978 were analysed. Type 1 diabetes was diagnosed in the presence of diagnostic blood sugars in combination with ketonuria or ketoacidosis and/or positive anti IA2 and anti-GAD antibodies. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed in those individuals who had negative antibodies or had no history of ketoacidosis. One patient had ketonaemia at diagnosis but was not acidotic. When subsequently found to have negative antibodies his insulin was successfully withdrawn and he was treated with Metformin for over 1 year with HbA1c of <7%. 251 (237 with T1DM, 13 with Type 2, 1 with secondary diabetes) had attended at least once in the last 3 years. The remainder had either moved away or been lost to follow-up and were excluded.
Where data was missing, the paper records were examined (n=105). For missing blood and urine values, the local laboratories (Waikato Hospital, Medlab, Pathlab) were contacted.
Admission and outpatient attendance data was obtained by a query to the HOSPRO information system.
Where appropriate, data is expressed as mean (95% Confidence Intervals).
Microalbuminuria defined as an Albumin / Creatinine Ratio (ACR) >2.5 in males; >3.5 in females, on more than one occasion. Two or more abnormal results are required to confirm persistent microalbuminuria. Proteinuria was defined as ACR >30. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from weight (kg) / [height (m)]2
For patients under 20 years of age, BMI-for-age percentiles were calculated using the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention Growth Charts.
For this audit, we used the American Diabetes Association recommendations15 for treatment of hyperlipidaemia over the age of 10, if the LDL cholesterol is ≥4.1 mmol/L and to consider therapy if LDL is 3.4-4 mmol/L if there are other cardiovascular risk factors present. Target LDL is < 2.6 mmol/L.

Results

All patients

There were 251 young people with diabetes (237 Type 1; 13 Type 2; 1 chronic pancreatitis); 135 were female; and 212 described themselves as of European origin, 27 as Maori, 5 as Pacific Islander, 4 as Asian (Chinese), and 3 as Indian.
Four patients (1.6%) were hypothyroid and 1 (0.4%) had previously been thyrotoxic and was now euthyroid; 6 (2.4%) had coeliac disease. Three patients had symptomatic peripheral neuropathy (1%) and 6 (2.4%) were recorded as having depression.
Over 5 years there have been 504 in-patient episodes (2 per patient) amounting to 1994 days in hospital (7.9 days per patient). There were a total of 7063 outpatient attendances (5.6 per patient per year).

Type 1 diabetes

Demographic details are indicated in Table 1. Glycaemic control was generally poor but worst in the 15-19 year age group (Table 2). There was no relationship between insulin regimen and glycaemic control.
In the patients who were 15 years and younger with T1DM, urine had been measured for protein in 48 of 99 (48%). In those patients aged 16 year and over, urine was measured for protein in 119 of 138 (86.2%). Proteinuria was present in 4 patients, microalbuminuria in 25 patients (7 with intermittent microalbuminuria but in 4 patients, only 1 specimen had been tested) giving a prevalence of nephropathy of 18-29/119 (15-22%).
Of 220 children aged over 10 years, 166 (75%) had lipids measured. One patient was taking a statin. There were 89 (54%) with an LDL >2.6mmol/L, 14 (8.4%) with LDL≥4.1mmol/L, and 3 (1.8%) with LDL 3.4–4.0 mmol/L and one other risk factor (smoking, hypertension, or microalbuminuria). All patients had smoking status recorded; 18 are current smokers , 5 are ex-smokers.

Table 1. Type 1 diabetes by age—glycaemic control and insulin regimens

Variable
All ages
16–25 years
Under 16 years
N
Male (%)
Age (CI)
Duration (yr)
Latest HbA1c
Mean HbA1c (last 3)
A1c measured in 1st year after diagnosis (%)
% achieving A1c < 6.2% during first year
237
109 (46)
16.7 (16–17.4)
7.22 (6.5–7.93)
9.3 (9.0–9.7)
9.17 (9.0–9.4)
66 (28)
8 (12)
138
63 (45.6)
20.9 (20.4–21.3)
9.5 (8.6–10.5)
9.3 (8.6–9.9)
9.4 (9.1–9.7)
31 (22.5)
3 (10)
99
46 (46)
10.9 (7.3–14.5)
4.0 (0.7–7.3)
9.4 (8.0–10.8
8.9 (7.8–10.0)
35 (35)
5 (14)
Insulin injections:
5 or more
4
3 or less

114
41
53

67
35
12

47
6
41
Pumps
Insulin dose (u/kg)
22
0.96
15
0.87
7
1.1

In the patients aged 16 and over, blood pressure (BP) was measured in 135 (97.8%) of them; 11 (8.1%) patients had a systolic BP ≥130 mmHg, and 10 (7.4%) patients had a diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg.
BP was measured in 89% of the patients aged 15 years and younger; 2 (2.2%) patients had systolic BP >120 mmHg (1 with coarctation), and 3 (3.4%) patients had a diastolic BP >70 mmHg.
Of those patients with T1DM, 26.9% of males and 29% of females were overweight or obese. Of those patients aged under 20 years, 16 females and 9 males had a BMI-for-age between the 85-95th percentile; 5 females and 3 males under 20 year had a BMI-for-age ≥95th centile. In the over 20 years age group, 16 males and 4 females were overweight, 4 males and 12 females were obese.
Of those patients with T1DM, 67 had a duration of diabetes over 10 years. Of these, 25% had evidence of nephropathy (12 had microalbuminuria and 5 proteinuria), one of whom is on CAPD. Six (9%) patients had no documented eye screening—but of the remainder, 25% had retinopathy (10 background, 5 sight threatening); 41 (61%) had LDL cholesterol >2.6 mmol/L, and 9 (13.4%) would qualify for statins using the ADA criteria. Nine (13.4%) patients are current smokers, 2 (3%) peripheral neuropathy, and 3 (4.5%) are listed as suffering from depression.

Type 2 diabetes:

There were 13 patients (including 7 males) with T2DM. The 13 patients included 7 Maori, 1 Pacific Islander, 4 European, and 1 Asian Indian. One teenager had Prader Willi syndrome. The mean age was 19.6 years (range 14–23 years) and duration of diabetes was 1.7 years.
All patients were obese with a BMI 39 (males 37.3; females 40.3). Mean HbA1c 8.8%. Six were treated with diet alone, 4 with Metformin alone, 1 with insulin only, 2 with insulin plus Metformin, and 1 with insulin plus Acarbose. Five (38%) patients had a systolic BP >130 mmHg or diastolic BP >80 mmHg. Two (15%) had microalbuminuria, one of whom was on an ACE inhibitor. Six (46%) patients had attended retinal screening—none had retinopathy.
Nine patients had their fasting lipids measured; their mean total cholesterol level was 5.6 mmol/L, HDL 1.1 mmol/L, triglycerides 6.4 mmol/L, and mean LDL 3.1 mmol/L. Three (33%) patients had LDL-C >3.4 mmol/L and 1 (11%) patient had severe hypertriglyceridaemia (28 mmol/L).

Table 2. Glycaemic control by age in 251 children and young adults with diabetes

Age (years)
Numbers
Mean HbA1c (CI)
20–25
15–19
10–14
<10
94
67
61
29
9.2 (CI 8.8–9.6)
9.9 (CI 9.5–10.3)
8.7 (CI 8.4–9.0)
9.4 (CI 8.9–9.9 )

Discussion

This audit of the process and outcomes of care of children and young adults with diabetes, in a semi-rural district in North Island New Zealand, has demonstrated a disappointing picture of poor glycaemic control and moderately high rates of microvascular complications, as seen in other studies. Despite the use of multiple injection therapy and carbohydrate-counting, few people achieved satisfactory control (only 25% had a recent HbA1c ≤8%).
A limitation of our study is that the exact number of people aged under 26 years with diabetes in Waikato is unknown. The published literature on defaulters from follow-up, however, suggests they have worse control and greater risk of complications.16
Although glycaemic control is poor, it is similar to other published studies in Europe of unselected young people with diabetes. Few data on young people with diabetes in New Zealand are available. In Christchurch, the mean HbA1c for people aged between 13 and 20 years was 10.2% and 9.5%, respectively, for females and males.17
The type of insulin regimen (including use of pumps) does not appear to have much impact on glycaemic control—although of 23 patients with a duration of diabetes >2 years and an HbA1c ≤7.5%, 6 were on 2 injections, 1 on 3 injections, 1 on 4 injections, and 13 on 5 injections (per day).
Twenty-two patients were using pumps. The pump data may be misleading, however, as we have chosen to offer pump therapy to young people having difficulty achieving satisfactory control with multiple injections, and in this group there has been an overall reduction in HbA1c and admissions with DKA (data not shown).
Age, sex, insulin regimen, BMI, season, social circumstances, and family history were all associated with glycaemic control in the Scottish study but not with deprivation score based on post code. Neither the Hvidore nor the Scottish study6,10 were able to identify definitive reasons for centre differences in mean HbA1c.
Dabaghdao18 suggested that poor control in childhood led to poor control in adolescence and beyond. Other studies have suggested that poor early control is associated with a four-fold increase in the subsequent prevalence of nephropathy19. An intriguing observation of the DCCT collaborators was that the tight control (initiated 1 year after diagnosis) was associated with preservation of islet cell function for a greater period than the group randomised to conventional (poor) control.20
There have been a few small studies, looking at the impact on beta cell function and intensive normalisation of glycaemic control from diagnosis with conflicting results, but no long-term randomised studies.21,22
Interestingly, there are huge differences in the number of children with a normal HbA1c during the first year after diagnosis. Some centres achieve this result in as many as 74% of their patients.23 Irrespective of the long-term benefits, this implies significant differences in both expectation and training of the person with diabetes.
Even when centres are benchmarked against others, it is difficult to achieve a change in the overall mean HbA1c.24 Nevertheless, Berger and colleagues demonstrated that (in adults) a 5-day training course resulted in prolonged overall improvements in HbA1c without a corresponding increase in severe hypoglycaemia.25,26 Similar improvements were seen in the DAFNE study in the UK, although adolescents were not included.27
The prevalence of retinopathy among screened patients is similar to published series,7,8,28,29 but there were a worrying number of patients who appeared to have avoided retinal screening for prolonged periods of time. Similarly, screening for microalbuminuria appears to have been done in the majority of young people but positive results were not always followed up.
Use of ACE inhibitors is reasonable in those with confirmed nephropathy, although this partly depends on the criteria for diagnosis (of 13 young people with 3 or more abnormal results, 11 were on ACE inhibitors. None of those patients with just 2 abnormal results were treated with ACE-inhibitors). A significant proportion appear to have intermittent proteinuria and a recent publication found that up to 60% of people with T1DM have spontaneous resolution unrelated to ACE inhibitor use.30
Suboptimal lipid profiles were very common, and only one patient was receiving any treatment. Cardiovascular risk charts will underestimate risk and are inappropriate for this age group.31 Only the American Diabetes Association has published specific guidelines for young people with T1DM, and with the knowledge that most will die prematurely from a vascular accident, earlier use of statins may be appropriate. As with use of ACE inhibitors, however, consideration has to be given to the risk to the developing foetus in the event of conception occurring whilst taking them.
Nearly 30% of those with T1DM, and 100% with T2DM, are overweight. This may reflect the rising incidence of obesity in children and adolescents. In New Zealand, in 1997, approximately 25% of 15 to 18 year olds and one in three 19 to 24 year olds were found to be overweight or obese.32 Weight gain is common during adolescence (especially in girls); and with intensive insulin therapy, the weight gain can sometimes be spectacular33 and likely to be a disincentive to better glycaemic control.
Perhaps the most worrying finding in our study was that of those patients with T2DM. All 13 were diagnosed in the last 4 years (mean duration 1.7 years) at an average age of 19.6 years. This rising incidence of T2DM is predictable and parallels the increasing prevalence of obesity in childhood.
Lastly, as we do not know how representative these data are of New Zealand in general, we are undertaking a similar national audit in this age group.
Author information: Adrian R Scott, Consultant Endocrinologist, Regional Diabetes Service; Susie Whitcombe, Diabetes Nurse Educator ; David Bouchier, Consultant Paediatrician, Paediatric Department; Peter Dunn, Consultant Endocrinologist, Regional Diabetes Service, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton
Correspondence: Dr Adrian Scott, Diabetes Centre, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London E9 6SR, UK. Fax: +44 208510501; email: xoe06@hotmail.com
References:
  1. Laing SP, Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD, et al. The British Diabetic Association Cohort Study, I: all-cause mortality in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1999;16:459–65.
  2. Laing SP. Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD, et al. The British Diabetic Association Cohort Study, II: cause-specific mortality in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1999;16:466–71.
  3. The Organisation of Services for Children in the United Kingdom – Report of the British Paediatric Association Working Party. Diabet Med. 1990:7:457–63.
  4. Borch-Johnsen K. The prognosis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: an epidemiological approach. Dan Med Bull. 1989;36:336–49.
  5. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.
  6. Scottish Study Group for the care of the young diabetic. Factors influencing glycemic control in young people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:239–44.
  7. Wills CJ, Scott A, Swift PGF, et al. Retrospective Review of Care and Outcomes in Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes in Trent Region, UK: Improvements Required. BMJ. 2003;327:7409.
  8. Olsen BS, Johannesen J, Sjolie AK, et al. Metabolic control and prevalence of microvascular complications in young Danish patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med.1999,16:79–85.
  9. Asao K, Sarti C, Forsen T, et al. Long term mortality in nationwide cohorts of childhood-onset Type 1 diabetes in Japan and Finland. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2037–42.
  10. Mortensen HB, Robertson KJ, Aanstoot H-J, et al. Insulin management and metabolic control of Type 1 diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence in 18 countries. Diabet Med. 1998;15:752–9.
  11. Krowlewski AS, Laffel LMB, Krowlewski M, et al. Glycosylated hemoglobin and risk of microalbuminuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1251–5.
  12. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr. 1994;125:177–88.
  13. Nordfeld S, Ludvigsson J. Severe hypoglycaemia in children with IDDM – a prospective population study 1992-1994. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:497–502.
  14. Dorchy H, Roggemans M-P, Willems D. Glycated haemoglobin and related factors in diabetic children and adolescents under 18 years of age: a Belgian experience. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:2–6.
  15. American Diabetes Association. Management of dyslipidemia in children and adolescents with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2194–7.
  16. Griffin SJ. Lost to follow-up: the problem of defaulters from diabetes clinics. Diabet Med. 1998 15 (suppl.3):S14–S24.
  17. Lunt H, Kendall D, Moore MP, et al. Type 1 diabetes: glycaemic control during adolescence. N Z Med J. 2002;115:282–3.
  18. Dabadghao P, Vidmar S, Cameron FJ. Deteriorating diabetic control through adolescence – do the origins lie in childhood? Diabet Med. 2001;18:889–94.
  19. Rudberg S, Ullman E, Dahlquist G. Relationship between early metabolic control and the development of microalbuminuria – a longitudinal study in children with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1993;36:1309–14.
  20. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive therapy on residual B-Cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:517–23.
  21. Krarup T, Madsbad S. Effect of two periods with intensified insulin treatment on B-cell function during the first 18 months of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabet Metab. 1986;12:256–60.
  22. Madsbad S, Krarup T, Regeur L, et al. Effect of strict blood glucose control on residual beta-cell function in insulin-dependent diabetics. Diabetologia. 1981;20:230–4.
  23. Swift PGF for of Trent Regional Paediatric Diabetes Interest Group, Utilising the partial remission phase for a multicentre audit of glycaemic control in the first year after diagnosis. Diab Res Clin Pract. 1999;44:Suppl S32P62.
  24. Danne T, Mortensen HB, Hougaard P, et al. Persistent differences among centers over 3 years in glycemic control and hypoglycemia in a study of 3805 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the Hvidore study group. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1342–7.
  25. Bott S, Bott U, Berger M, Muhlhauser I. Intensified insulin therapy and the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia. 1997;40:926–32.
  26. Muhlhauser I, Bruckner J, Berger M, et al. Evaluation of an intensified insulin treatment and teaching programme as routine management of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes; Diabetologia. 1987;30:681–90.
  27. DAFNE Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325:746–51.
  28. Danne T, Weber B, Hartmann R, et al. Long-term glycemic control has a non-linear association to the frequency of background retinopathy in adolescents with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:1390–6.
  29. Burger W, Hovener G, Dusterhus R, et al. Prevalence and development of retinopathy in children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal study. Diabetologia. 1986;29:17–22.
  30. Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Silva KH, et al. Regression of microalbuminuria in Type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2285–93.
  31. Yeo WW, Yeo KR. Predicting CHD risk in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine. 2001;18:341–4.
  32. Russell DG, Parnell WR, Wilson NC. NZ Food: NZ People. Key results of the National Nutrition Survey 1997. New Zealand Youth Health Status Report; 2002:87–109. Available online. URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/49ba80c00757b8804c256673001d47d0/8f1dbeb1e0e1c70c4c2567d80009b770?OpenDocument Accessed December 2004.
  33. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Influence of Intensive Diabetes Treatment on Body Weight and Composition of Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Diabetes Care. 24:1711–21.


     
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals