![]() |
||||||
|
||||||
Specific oral contraceptive use and venous thromboembolism
resulting in hospital admission
Patricia Heuser, Katrina Tonga, Raewyn Hopkins, Marissa
Henderson, Mark Weatherall, Scott Metcalfe, Richard Beasley
During the last decade, the increased risk of VTE associated
with different types of oral contraceptive agents has been increasingly
recognised.1 In particular, epidemiological
studies have identified that women taking third-generation oral contraceptives
containing either gestodene or desogestrel have a thrombotic risk about two-fold
higher than that of women using second-generation oral contraceptives containing
levonorgestrel.2–5
There is also preliminary evidence of an increased risk of
VTE with the anti-androgen oral contraceptive containing cyproterone acetate and
ethinyloestradiol, although the relative risk compared with other oral
contraceptive agents has not been clearly determined due to the small number of
cases (a total of 30 women taking anti-androgen oral contraceptive agents in the
three studies).6–8
We have investigated this issue by comparing the frequency
of use of specific oral contraceptive agents in patients discharged from
hospital with a radiologically-confirmed diagnosis of DVT and/or PE with
expected frequencies derived from national prescription data.
MethodsWe reviewed the medical records
of female patients aged between 15 and 55 years who were discharged with a
diagnosis of DVT or PE between January 1996 and April 2002. Records were
identified from three tertiary referral hospitals (Wellington, Green Lane, and
Auckland) and three district general hospitals (Hutt, Kenepuru, and Masterton)
in New Zealand.
Inclusion criteria were:
Information was
abstracted from the medical records, including documented current oral
contraceptive use, which was classified according to five categories:
progestogen only, second generation, third generation, anti-androgen, and brand
not specified. The two anti-androgen agents were Diane-35 and Estelle-35, both
containing 2 mg cyproterone acetate and 35 mcg ethinyloestradiol.
The expected frequency of use of each of the five
categories of oral contraceptive agents was determined from national
prescription records for each year 1996 to 2002, held by the New Zealand
Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC).
A Chi-squared test was performed comparing the observed
numbers of subjects with DVT and/or PE for each category of oral contraceptive
compared to what would be expected based on national prescribing.
ResultsThere were 330 subjects, with a
median (range) age of 40 (15 to 55) years included in the analysis. The
diagnosis was DVT alone in 179 (54.2%), PE alone in 102 (30.9%), and both DVT
and PE in 49 (14.8%). In 81 of the 95 (85%) subjects for whom oral contraceptive
therapy was recorded, the specific brand of the agent was stated
(Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of the observed frequency of
specific oral contraceptive use in patients with VTE discharges from hospital
versus expected frequency of use derived from national prescription
data
The observed frequencies were different from the expected
frequencies, with progestogen only and second-generation agents less frequently
used in subjects with VTE than expected, and third-generation and anti-androgen
agents more frequently used than expected (Chi-squared statistic 17.36, df 3,
p=0.0006). The two main contributions to the Chi-squared statistic were the
lower than expected use of progestogen only (Chi-squared contribution 4.0) and
the higher than expected use of anti-androgen agents (Chi-squared contribution
6.7).
The relative market share of the different oral
contraceptive agents varied throughout the study period, primarily in response
to the public concerns raised regarding the risk of VTE associated with third
generation oral contraceptive use. This resulted in a marked reduction in the
market share of third generation agents from 1999, with a corresponding increase
in the other agents; in particular, second generation agents (Table
2).
Table 2. National market share for specific oral
contraceptive agents during the period of the study
The rank order of the observed versus expected frequency of
specific oral contraceptive use was maintained in the periods before and after
1999, with ratios for anti-androgen, third-generation, second-generation, and
progestogen-only agents of 1.21, 1.05, 1.01, 0.57 and 2.27, 1.88, 0.60, 0.29 for
the periods 1996 to 1998 and 1999 to 2002, respectively.
DiscussionPrincipal findingsThis study
has identified a greater than expected use of anti-androgen oral contraceptive
agents in women with VTE resulting in hospital admission. This
disproportionately greater use of anti-androgen agents was observed throughout
the 6-year period of the study, and was at least as high as with the
third-generation oral contraceptive agents.
Methodological issuesThere are a number of methodological
issues which are relevant to the interpretation of the study findings. One
possible confounder is indication, if anti-androgen agents were preferentially
prescribed to women who were perceived to be at higher risk of VTE. However, the
available evidence indicates this is unlikely, as this contraceptive agent is
registered and marketed primarily for its anti-androgen properties and not for
any reduced thrombotic risk. In addition, the proportion of prescriptions for
anti-androgen agents increased from 1999, in contrast to a marked fall with the
third-generation contraceptive agents coinciding with concerns over their VTE
risk.
However, it is possible that anti-androgen use may have been
associated with obesity, due to its indication for women with polycystic ovary
disease. As obesity increases the risk of VTE,9
this could have led to an over-estimation of the risk of anti-androgen agents.
Conversely, on the basis of their indication for acne, anti-androgen agents may
have been preferentially prescribed to younger women, which would have resulted
in an under-estimation of their risk.
The publicity in 1999 relating to the risk of
third-generation oral contraceptive agents could have led to potential biases
which operated in opposite directions. These biases could have occurred if women
at high risk were less likely to be prescribed third-generation agents, or if
women taking third-generation oral contraceptives were more likely to be
referred and diagnosed as having VTE.
A major effect of these biases was not evident from the time
trend data, in which the rank order for the specific oral contraceptive agents
was maintained prior to and after 1999, when the major publicity about the risks
of third-generation agents and associated reduction in market share occurred.
Finally, another source of potential bias relates to the 14 subjects in whom the
specific brands of oral contraceptive therapy was not stated.
Comparison with other studiesThe findings complement the three
previous epidemiological studies that have investigated the relative use of VTE
in subjects using anti-androgen agents. The World Health Organization (WHO)
study identified a 15-fold risk of VTE with the anti-androgen product containing
cyproterone and ethinyloestradiol at a dose of 35 mcg compared with
non-users.6
Compared with non-users, a four-fold greater risk of VTE was
reported with anti-androgen products containing cyproterone and the higher 50
mcg dose of ethinyloestradiol. This paradox, of a higher risk associated with a
lower oestrogen dose has also been observed with
desogestrel6 and requires further
investigation.
The case-control study based on the United Kingdom General
Practice Research Database reported that the relative risk of VTE with
anti-androgen oral contraceptive agents was four times greater than those using
second-generation oral contraceptive agents.7
An absolute 13.3-fold increased risk was identified with anti-androgen oral
contraceptive agents from this study, similar to the 17.6-fold estimate reported
in the New Zealand case-control study of fatal
PE.8
Clinical implications:Our findings raise several concerns.
For example, we need better methods to assess the potential risk of VTE before
introducing novel oral contraceptive agents into clinical practice. This is
illustrated by the recent report of VTE associated with the novel oral
contraceptive ethinyloestradiol with
drospirenone.10
Furthermore, prolonged post-marketing surveillance and
epidemiological studies are needed to investigate the occurrence of VTE
following their introduction and widespread use. VTE is an uncommon event in
young women, and clinical trials of hormonal contraceptives are likely to have
insufficient statistical power to detect infrequent events, particularly if
subjects recruited are appropriately screened for risk of VTE.
Another concern is the inadequate assessment of risk of VTE
in our patient group, with 9.3% of women on second- or third-generation oral
contraceptive agents despite a past history of VTE. Furthermore, despite a
reduction in the overall use of third-generation-combined oral contraceptive
agents since the extensive publicity of their risk of VTE, they maintain a
significant market share.
Reassuringly, oral progestogen-only contraceptives were
prescribed less frequently than expected in women who were admitted to hospital
with a VTE. It should be acknowledged that this finding does not indicate that
progestogen-only preparations do not increase the risk of VTE, rather than the
risk is higher with other types of hormonal contraceptive agents. However it
does support the current recommendation that women at high risk of VTE should
preferentially be prescribed either a progesterone-only pill or non-hormonal
measures.11,12
In summary, these findings indicate an increased risk of VTE
resulting in hospital admission with the use of anti-androgen oral contraceptive
agents containing cyproterone and ethinyloestradiol. They also reinforce the
importance of assessing the risk of VTE in women in whom oral contraceptive
agents are considered.1,9,11
Author information:
Patricia Heuser, Research Nurse, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand,
Wellington; Katrina Tonga, Medical Student,
Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago,
Wellington; Raewyn Hopkins, Senior Research Nurse, Green Lane Hospital,
Auckland; Marissa Henderson, Medical Student,
Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago,
Wellington; Mark Weatherall, Senior Lecturer,
Rehabilitation Research and Teaching Unit, Department of Medicine, Wellington
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington; Scott
Metcalfe, Senior Advisor, PHARMAC, Wellington; Richard Beasley,
Director, Medical Research Institute of New
Zealand, Wellington (and Visiting Professor, University of Southampton,
Southampton, UK)
Acknowledgement: We
acknowledge the helpful comments of Professor David Skegg.
Correspondence:
Professor R Beasley, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, PO Box 10055,
Wellington 6001. Fax: (04) 472 9224;email: richard.beasley@mrinz.ac.nz
References:
|
||||||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |