![]() |
|||
|
|||
Performance indicators: primary health, secondary care, and
diabetes
Rigorously measured outcomes are scarce in local healthcare
systems, especially for cost-effectiveness in prevention of common disorders.
A seminal paper by Crampton and colleagues (published in the
2 April 2004 issue of the NZMJ)1 is
valuable—although it went largely unnoticed. It thoroughly canvassed
important criteria for primary care indicators. Diabetes is used as an example.
Diabetes also crosses into a secondary care prevention indicator of high-cost
‘open-ended’ hospital admissions being an objective international
indicator.2
There are other compelling reasons why diabetes is New
Zealand’s best performance indicator. For example, in USA a well as New
Zealand, diabetes is ranked first because of its killing
propensities.3 In addition, in a New Zealand
survey, 210,000 diabetes patients and their families are involved with 14% of
the overall hospital costs.
Prevention and better quality care could reduce these costly
hospitalisations5,6 and half of the cases of
kidney failure and dialysis could be
prevented,4,5 by better use of diabetes
performance indicators. The same applies for coronary disease, blindness, and
amputations if there was more investment in moving
upstream.3,7
Insulin resistance and pre-diabetes may be present for 20
years before a diabetes diagnosis is made—often itself delayed 12 years or
more. Upstream screening of blood sugars thus becomes a key indicator in a
common disorder.8
Eight percent of adults had undiagnosed diabetes in the
Ausdiab Study; and unknown rates of diabetes will prove to be an unsustainable
cost in New Zealand.9 Raised blood glucose is
also a key indicator for morbidity, and all cause mortality as well as the
earliest predictor of preventable cardiovascular
diseases.10
New Zealand’s yearly ‘get checked’
programme (3 years’ stored results) yields a unique continuing data set.
Those persons with diabetes want these 12 digitally transmissible items used.
Health systems should maintain wellness in the clash between
financially imposed environments and our ‘hunter-gatherer’ genes.
Diabetes can be used (via these health systems) as an ideal performance
indicator of accomplishment spanning primary, secondary, and tertiary
preventions—and to monitor social community and educational inputs to
health preservation.
Crampton and colleagues clearly listed four excellent key
performance indicator uses. A fifth would be the
educative function of encrypted peer-reviewed
rankings from the ‘get checked’ results thus allowing
improvement and changes to practice.
Indeed, with 40 patients per doctor in New Zealand, diabetes
is an invaluable and unique performance indicator.
Don W
Beaven
Patron Murray
Dear
President Sarah
Thomson
CEO Diabetes
New Zealand Inc
References:
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |