![]() |
|||
|
|||
Poisoning by wild honey
This extract is taken from
a article by Dr E. D. Aubin that was published in the New Zealand Medical
Journal 1905, Volume 4 (13), p19–24.
The knowledge of poisoning by wild honey extends into remote
antiquity, dating from the time of our old friend Xenophon. Although of not
frequent occurrence in modern times, cases have been reported in various parts
of the world, such as in India and South America. In New Zealand the victims
have mostly been Maoris, and the districts affected Thames, Piako, and the East
Coast.
There seems to be some doubt as to the source of the poison.
According to Mr. I. Hopkins, Government Apiarist, who has taken a good deal of
interest in the subject, the responsibility rests with the yellow flowers of a
cress-like plant called the “whauriki,” which grows chiefly in
swamps. In other countries a species of
Rhododendron has been suspected. In any
case, the noxious material is either gathered by the bees directly from the
flowers, or is elaborated from the products of the flower, or evolved by
decomposition at a later date.
Wild honey only is affected, especially that deposited in or
near swamps and in certain parts of the bush. There is no instance, as far as I
am aware, of poisoning by cultivated honey.
Discussion
Dr. Eccles said he had a good deal of experience of honey
poisoning in the north, and the symptoms generally were such as Dr Aubin had
described. He did not think the poisoned honey came from the
whauriki, but from another plant in the
bush something like a sycamore, the leaf being very white underneath. It
flowered rather later than most flowering shrubs. He had, unfortunately,
forgotten the name of the plant.
It was noticed that honey poisoning occurred only when that
shrub was in flower. It was not generally known that whenever bush honey was
found to be poisonous the combs where not sealed, and the Natives in the north
would not eat honey unless they saw that the comb was sealed. Almost every case
of honey poisoning he had seen had originated from eating honey brought home by
the youngsters, and investigation afterwards always proved that the combs had
not properly sealed. With regard to treatment, he was a great believer in
stimulants. He first of all gave an ordinary emetic and purgative, and then gave
stimulants.
Dr. W. Brown said it had been his misfortune to see four and
the remains of two other cases of honey poisoning. The four cases which he saw
were all in one family, being a mother and her children, ranging in age from
eight to twelve years. They all had convulsions, which lasted off and on for
about five hours—practically the whole night long—and it was a most
alarming state of affairs. He gave them bromide of potassium, which they kept
throwing up. The children recovered in a day or two, but the mother was ill for
some considerable time.
Note:
According to the NZ Food Safety Authority in October 2003, the plant responsible
for toxic honey is the tutu
(Coriaria
arborea),
and the last known honey poisoning case was in 1991. See
http://www.nzfsa.govt.nz/animalproducts/publications/info-pamphlet/bee-products/toxic-honey.htm
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |