![]() |
|||
|
|||
Lignocaine neurotoxicity following fibre-optic
bronchoscopy
Karl Rodins, Michael Hlavac and Lutz Beckert
A 70-year-old man was referred to the Respiratory Service at
Christchurch Hospital for investigation of haemoptysis by bronchoscopy. The
patient had ischaemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation. His medications
included atenolol, frusemide, allopurinol, captopril, Mylanta and warfarin (INR
3). He had history of neither seizure activity nor other diseases of the central
nervous system. Morphine 10 mg IM and atropine 0.6 mg IM were given 60 minutes
prior to the procedure. No short-acting benzodiazepine was used.
The following regimen for local anaesthesia of the airway
was used. Fifteen minutes prior to the procedure the patient received lignocaine
5 ml 4% (200 mg) via a nebulizer. Thereafter, 10 ml 4% lignocaine gel (400 mg)
was applied within the nasal passage. At the beginning of the bronchoscopy, 10
ml of 4% lignocaine (400 mg) was applied to the vocal cords. Two applications of
10 ml of 1% lignocaine (200 mg) were then made to the right and left upper
lobes. In total, the patient received 1200 mg of lignocaine.
The procedure was uncomplicated. Oxygen saturations were
maintained above 95% using 2 l/min of oxygen via nasal prongs. Bronchial
washings were taken; no cause for the haemoptysis was identified. The total time
taken to complete the bronchoscopy following intubation was 10
minutes.
About five minutes following the procedure, the patient
became drowsy and experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The seizure
lasted about two minutes and was self-limiting. Thirty minutes after this event,
the patient’s prolactin level was 823 mIU/L (normal range 80 to 350
mIU/L). The patient was observed for 24 hours and discharged without any further
treatment. He remained well six weeks following this episode.
His lignocaine level was 32.7
μmol/l 30 minutes
following the procedure. Lignocaine is potentially toxic at levels greater than
30 μmol/l. The lignocaine level may have been as high as 40 μmol/l at
the time of the seizure. According to the ‘Adverse Drug Reaction
Probability Scale’,1 this patient
probably had a seizure secondary to
lignocaine toxicity through mucosal absorption. Nebulization and absorption
through the mucosa is a potent form of drug delivery used in therapeutic
settings.
Morphine is a useful drug to minimize the cough reflex and
sedate the patient, but it also lowers the seizure
threshold.2 Seizures have also been
particularly noted on the withdrawal of narcotic
drugs.3
The 1200 mg of lignocaine used equates to 16 mg/kg although
some would be suctioned out or swallowed. Little of the swallowed lignocaine
would be absorbed. There is also no correlation between doses of lignocaine and
peak concentrations.4,5 Neurotoxicity may begin
with plasma concentrations of 5–6 g/l.6
However, in a series of 12 patients receiving on average 622 mg lignocaine, no
patients exceeded the toxic concentration.4 In
a position paper on fibre-optic bronchoscopy in adults published by the Thoracic
Society of Australia and New Zealand,7 the
maximal dose of lignocaine suggested was 512
mg.5 This is far less than the doses of
lignocaine used in our institution.
Although neurotoxicity through mucosal absorption is a rare
complication following a bronchoscopy, this case highlights that topical
lignocaine should be used sparingly.
Author information:
Karl Rodins, House Officer; Michael Hlavac, Advanced Trainee; Lutz Beckert,
Respiratory Physician, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Christchurch
Hospital, Christchurch
Correspondence: Dr
Lutz Beckert, Respiratory Physician, Department of Respiratory Medicine,
Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch. Fax: (03) 364 0914; email: Lutz.Beckert@cdhb.govt.nz
References:
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |