![]() |
|||
|
|||
This Issue in the Journal
Factors that influence
changes in smoking behaviour during pregnancy
D McLeod, S Pullon, T Cookson A cohort of 1283 pregnant women was surveyed to explore the
characteristics of women who continue to smoke beyond the first trimester of
pregnancy. Socioeconomically disadvantaged women, Maori women and women whose
partners smoked were significantly more likely to continue smoking in pregnancy.
Pregnant women were more likely to stop smoking if they were employed, in their
first pregnancy, or they experienced nausea. The characteristics of women who
continue to smoke needs to be taken into account in the provision of smoking
cessation support.
Improving the effectiveness
of smoking cessation in primary care: lessons learned
D Richards, L Toop, K Brockway, S Graham, B McSweeney, D MacLean, M Sutherland, A Parsons The ‘Smokescreen’ smoking cessation programme
was introduced into general practice in New Zealand in 1995 and had
an initial success rate of 10%. Pegasus
Health IPA has modified the programme (the PEGS programme) and encouraged
increased practice nurse involvement. This study shows the programme is being
widely used and helps one third of enrolled patients to remain non-smokers six
months after quitting. This result compares well with international statistics
and indicates the important role of the general practice sector in smoking
cessation in New Zealand.
The cost to the New Zealand
Government of providing ‘free’ primary medical care: an estimate
based upon the Rand Health Insurance Experiment
T Robinson New Zealand is moving towards the provision of free general
practice consultations to the public. There is substantial uncertainty about the
cost of such a policy. Uncertain factors include the likely increase in demand
for GP consultations and the downstream effects in terms of medicine, laboratory
and hospital use. This article attempts to estimate the effects of these factors
and suggests that the provision of free general practice might cost the
Government $435 to $592 million dollars a year.
Is the PRIME (Primary
Response In Medical Emergencies) scheme acceptable to rural general
practitioners in New Zealand?
T Hore, G Coster, J Bills The health reforms of the mid 1990s included an initiative
to improve emergency medical care to those in remote areas of New Zealand. The
PRIME (Primary Response In Medical Emergencies) scheme incorporates a
coordinated response between rural general practitioners, advanced nurses and
local emergency services to provide appropriate management of trauma and medical
emergencies in rural locations. This paper aims to ascertain the acceptability
of the PRIME scheme to rural general practitioners in New Zealand and therefore
identify areas for improvement for all parties concerned.
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |