NZMA Home

Table of contents
Current issue
Search journal
Archived issues
NZMJ Obituaries 1887-2006
Classifieds
Hotline (free ads)
How to subscribe
How to contribute
How to advertise
Contact Us
Copyright
Other journals
The New Zealand Medical Journal

 Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 02-July-2002, Vol 115 No 1157

Peri-operative use of oestrogen containing medications and deep vein thrombosis - a national survey
David W Ardern, Denis R Atkinson, Anna J Fenton.
Abstract
Aim To determine the practice of New Zealand orthopaedic surgeons when women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or a combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) present for major surgery. Current practice is compared with recently produced guidelines and manufacturers advice.
Methods A postal survey was sent to all New Zealand orthopaedic surgeons.
Results The response rate was 80% (118/148). There was wide variation in beliefs surrounding the peri-operative use of both of these medications. 44% of surgeons indicated that they would routinely advise discontinuing the COC pill peri-operatively for major surgery. 24% indicated that they would routinely advise discontinuing HRT peri-operatively. Recently released guidelines recommend that HRT should be stopped for at least 30 days prior to elective surgery and withheld for 90 days following surgery. Less than 3% of surgeons appeared to be routinely following this recommendation. Most manufacturers of COC pills recommend stopping the medication for at least four weeks prior to elective surgery. Only 25% of surgeons routinely practice in accordance with these recommendations.
Conclusions This survey clearly demonstrates substantial differences between current clinical practice, recently revised HRT guidelines and oral contraceptive manufacturers advice. These differences need to be brought to the attention of surgeons and guideline producers. Particular medico-legal caution in this area is advised.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are believed to increase the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism among users. Public advice given by the New Zealand Ministry of Health states that the odds of having a blood clot increase by 3 - 4 times for those on second generation pills and 6 - 8 times for those on third generation pills.1 For women taking hormone replacement therapy there is now good evidence to suggest that the risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased by 2 - 4 times.2-6
Surgery is associated with factors which promote DVT. It would be reasonable to expect, therefore, that the combination of an oestrogen containing medication and surgery could lead to significantly increased risk and avoidable post-operative complications. Evidence to support this assumption, however, is lacking and the risks associated with discontinuing medication are uncertain. The advice given by pharmaceutical companies is generally to discontinue a COC four weeks prior to surgery.7 Some also suggest withholding the medication for two weeks post-operatively. The advice given by manufacturers for HRT is to consider temporary discontinuation peri-operatively.7 In May 2001, the New Zealand Guidelines Group released recommendations to discontinue HRT for at least 30 days prior to elective surgery and for 90 days following surgery.8
Major orthopaedic surgery is known to be associated with a relatively high incidence of DVT. Studies using surveillance methods have reported that in the absence of prophylaxis the incidence of DVT following major hip or knee surgery is approximately 50%.9-11 A recent survey showed the prevalence of HRT use in New Zealand women aged between 45 - 64 years to be 20%.12 Almost half of the women surveyed had started it to prevent osteoporosis. Last year there were over 400 000 prescriptions written for COC pills within New Zealand. The presence of guidelines for their use peri-operatively is therefore of importance in orthopaedic surgery. This is especially so given the high level of media and public interest in this general area and the potential medico-legal implications. This is a survey of orthopaedic surgeons but the issue is relevant to all clinicians who may advise women about the use of medications in the peri-operative period.

Methods

A postal questionnaire was sent to all practicing orthopaedic surgeons within New Zealand. A follow-up letter was sent to non-responders after six weeks. Those surveyed were asked to indicate if they would stop such medications peri-operatively for major orthopaedic surgery either routinely, only in patients considered to be high risk, or would not discontinue. Neither the specific surgical procedures classified as “major orthopaedic surgery”, nor the specific risk factors that would create a “high risk patient” were listed in the questionnaire. These were left up to the interpretation of the individual responding to the survey. Such specific lists are not found in the relevant guidelines for clinical practice in this area. Surgeons were then asked to record how long prior to, and following surgery they would discontinue the medication.

Results

Response. There were 118 responses suitable for analysis out of the 148 surveyed (80%). Not all surgeons answered every question.
Discontinuing HRT peri-operatively (Table 1). 24% of the responding surgeons indicated that they would routinely advise discontinuing HRT peri-operatively. 25% would only do so in patients whom they considered to be at high risk, and 51% would not advise discontinuing HRT.
Table 1. When would medication be stopped prior to major orthopaedic surgery?

HRT
(n=118)
COCs
(n=117)

(No.)
(%*)
(No.)
(%*)
Routinely
28
24
51
44
Only in high risk patients
30
25
27
23
Not stopped
60
51
39
33
*Proportion of surgeons. High risk patients as perceived by the surgeon.

Discontinuing the COC pill peri-operatively (Table 1). 44% of surgeons would routinely advise women to discontinue their contraceptive pill peri-operatively. A further 23% would only advise this in patients who they considered to be at high risk, and 33% would not advise discontinuing the pill.
Clinical practice compared with guidelines (Tables 2, 3). Less than 3% (3/113) of responding surgeons indicated that they would advise withholding HRT for at least 30 days prior to surgery and for 90 days following surgery as suggested by the New Zealand Guidelines Group. 25% (28/113) would advise women to discontinue their contraceptive pill for at least 30 days prior to surgery as suggested by most pharmaceutical companies.
Table 2. Peri-operative use of hormone replacement therapy in relation to guidelines*.
No. days stopped pre-op.
No. surgeons
% surgeons
Not stopped
<30
30
>30
60
35
11
7
53
31
10
6
No. days re-started post-op.
No. surgeons
% surgeons
Not stopped
<90
90
60
50
3
53
44
3
*NZGG recommendations are to discontinue HRT for 30 days prior to surgery and 90 days following surgery.

Table 3. Peri-operative use of oral contraceptives in relation to guidelines*.
No. days stopped pre-op.
No. surgeons
% surgeons
Not stopped
<30
30
>30
38
46
22
7
34
41
19
6
No. days re-started post-op.
No. surgeons
% surgeons
Not stopped
<14
14
>14
38
16
13
46
34
14
11
41
*Most manufacturers advise discontinuing COC’s for at least 30 days prior to surgery
+/- withholding for 14 days following surgery.

Discussion

As 80% of practising orthopaedic surgeons within New Zealand completed the questionnaire the results are likely to reflect current practice.
This survey has demonstrated widespread variability of practice and significant differences from the relevant guidelines. This is especially so for the peri-operative use of HRT where only 3% of orthopaedic surgeons appear to be practicing in accordance with recently released guidelines. It would seem that surgeons are largely unaware of the new HRT guidelines released by the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG).8 It is also noted that these guidelines differ substantially from recommendations made by the pharmaceutical companies and authorities elsewhere (Table 4). Evidence for such recommendations is generally lacking and they tend to be based upon knowledge of the theoretical risks and resulting opinion. The recently published HERS study 6 has been cited as the only significant study to date to assess the effect of surgery on risk of VTE.8 This randomised controlled trial was designed to provide information on the outcome on subsequent cardiac events in postmenopausal women. It included older women with a mean age of 67 years, and all had established coronary artery disease (CAD). The findings suggest significantly increased risk of VTE among HRT users following lower-extremity fractures and for 90 days following surgery. Trial investigators thus recommended that participants discontinue HRT during periods of high risk such as surgery, immobilisation or severe illness and restart their medication when they return to normal mobility.13 The increased risk in this group has however been extrapolated to include all women in the recommendations to stop HRT for 30 days prior and for 90 days following surgery made by the NZGG.8
Table 4. Recommendations for peri-operative use of oestrogen containing medications.
Hormone Replacement Therapy
BNF
may be prudent to review the need for HRT
ACOG
benefit of stopping HRT has not yet been established
RCOG
no evidence at present to support a policy of routinely stopping HRT prior to surgery provided that appropriate thromboprophylaxis is employed
ICS
In the absence of other risk factors, there is insufficient evidence to support a policy of routinely stopping HRT; heparin thromboprophylaxis advisable where not discontinued
Combined Oral Contraceptives
BNF
preferably stop 4 weeks pre-op. & re-commence at the first menses occurring at least 2 weeks after full mobilization
ACOG
no studies to confirm the clinical benefits of stopping OC’s pre-operatively; balance the risks
RCOG
insufficient evidence to support a policy of routinely stopping OC’s prior to major surgery in the absence of other risk factors; prophylaxis may be warranted if additional risk factors are present
ICS
consider discontinuing 4 – 6 weeks before surgery but this should be balanced against risks of unwanted pregnancy; thromboprophylaxis advisable when not discontinued and other risk factors are present
BNF=British National formulary22, ACOG=American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,23 RCOG=Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,21,20 ICS=International Consensus Statement.19

The most obvious effects of discontinuing HRT for a period of time peri-operatively are likely to be a recurrence of unpleasant menopausal symptoms. The risks of precipitating more serious harm however, remain unknown. The authors of the HERS study concluded that although starting HRT for secondary prevention of CAD was not recommended given the favourable pattern of CAD events after several years of therapy, it could be appropriate to continue treatment in women already taking HRT.14 In view of this it would be wise to seek advice from the patient’s cardiologist before necessarily discontinuing HRT. Furthermore, it has been observed that the elevated risks of VTE appear to be greatest in the first year or two of HRT use.3,5,6 These observations might be due to a selective effect of HRT on women with a pre-existing risk for thrombosis.6 As yet, however, there is no certainty about this and the risks of temporarily discontinuing HRT for a substantial period of time before re-starting it are not clearly defined.
We believe that the apparent lack of adherence to the new HRT guidelines is likely to be contributed to by both a lack of awareness of their existence and a lack of confidence in their validity. The feasibility of being able to advise patients to discontinue their medication for a full month prior to surgery under presently-used hospital booking arrangements is also questionable.
Most pharmaceutical companies recommend stopping the oral contraceptive pill for four weeks prior to surgery, but this is not universally advocated by specialist groups (Table 4). This survey demonstrates that although 44% of orthopaedic surgeons routinely advised women to stop the pill prior to major surgery, only 25% advised women in accordance with the recommendations made by pharmaceutical companies. One reason for this variance is likely to be the perceived risks of unwanted pregnancy compared with the potentially small increased risks of not stopping the pill prior to major surgery. A policy of routinely stopping the contraceptive pill prior to surgery could well result in unwanted pregnancy.15 Pregnancy carries a much greater risk of VTE than does oral contraceptive use. In addition, the possibility of subsequent termination, with its associated physical and psychological risks, needs to be considered.
As with HRT there are relatively few data to quantify the increased risk posed by the use of oestrogen containing oral contraceptives around the time of major surgery. One large prospective study suggested that the risk of post-operative VTE was around two times but this was not statistically significant.16 Pro-thrombotic changes in haematological variables observed with oestrogen administration tend to return to baseline within one to two menstrual cycles after stopping treatment.17,18 Such observations have been used in the formation of recommendations by oral contraceptive manufacturers.
The use of anticoagulants has been advocated in women who have additional risk factors present and do not stop their contraceptive pill19,20, or hormone replacement therapy.19,21 In practice this is likely to include most patients taking HRT.19,21 Anticoagulant use in preference to withdrawing medication may also help explain the findings of this survey. This was not specifically enquired about in the survey.
Clearly the scientific data are confusing. Despite this we feel it is important for surgeons to make patients aware of the risks of using oestrogen-containing drugs. This is particularly so for patients undergoing elective surgery in the lower limbs. This should form part of the normal consent process and it should involve the prescriber and the patient. We also draw attention to the potential that guidelines have for creating unnecessary medico-legal risk in an increasingly hostile environment.
Author Information: David W Ardern, Orthopaedic Registrar; Denis R Atkinson, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Hawke’s Bay Hospital, Hastings; Anna J Fenton, Endocrinologist, Christchurch.
Acknowledgements. This research was funded by a grant from the Hawke’s Bay Medical Research Foundation.
Correspondence. Dr David Ardern, Department of Orthopaedics, Middlemore Hospital, Private Bag 93-311, Otahuhu, Auckland. email: dw.sl.ardern@xtra.co.nz.

References:
  1. Medsafe. An update on oral contraceptives and blood clots; June 2000. http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/cons.htm.
  2. Daly E, Vessey MP, Hawkins MM et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of hormone replacement therapy. Lancet 1996; 348: 977-80.
  3. Jick H, Derby LE, Myers MW et al. Risk of hospital admission for idiopathic venous thromboembolism among users of post-menopausal oestrogens. Lancet 1996; 348: 981-3.
  4. Perez Gutthann S, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Castellsague J et al. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case control study. BMJ 1997; 314: 796-800.
  5. Varas Lorenzo C, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Cattaruzzi C et al. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of hospitalisation for venous thromboembolism: a population-based study in southern Europe. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 387-90.
  6. Grady D, Wenger NK, Herrington D et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases risk for venous thromboembolic disease – the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 689-96.
  7. New Ethicals Compendium 7th ed. Auckland: Adis International; 2000.
  8. New Zealand Guidelines Group. The appropriate prescribing of hormone replacement therapy; May 2001. http://www.nzgg.org.nz.
  9. Gallus A, Raman K, Darby T. Venous thrombosis after elective hip replacement -the influence of preventive intermittent calf compression and of surgical technique. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 17-9.
  10. Stringer MD, Steadman CA, Hedges AR et al: Deep vein thrombosis after elective knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71-B: 492-7.
  11. Hoek JA, Nurmohamed MT, Hamelynck KJ et al. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis following total hip replacement by low molecular weight heparinoid. Thromb Haemost 1992; 67: 28-32.
  12. North FM, Sharples K. Changes in the use of hormone replacement therapy in New Zealand from 1991-1997. NZ Med J 2001; 114: 250-3.
  13. Grady D, Sawaya G. Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 1998; 105: 41-3.
  14. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA 1998; 280: 605-13.
  15. Canter RJ, Pryce J. Risk of pregnancy while waiting for an operation. BMJ 1985; 291: 516.
  16. Vessey M, Mant D, Smith A, Yeates D. Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: findings in a large prospective study. BMJ 1986; 292: 526.
  17. Robinson GE, Burren T, Mackie IJ et al. Changes in haemostasis after stopping the combined contraceptive pill: implications for major surgery. BMJ 1991; 302: 269-71.
  18. Middeldorp S, Meijers JCM, van de Ende AE et al. Effects on coagulation of levonorgestrel- and desogestrel- containing low dose oral contraceptives: a cross-over study. Thromb Haemost 2000; 84: 4-8.
  19. International Consensus Statement. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Int Angiol 1997; 16: 3-38.
  20. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Report of the RCOG working party on prophylaxis against thromboembolism in gynaecology and obstetrics. London: Chameleon Press; March 1995. p14.
  21. Greer IA, Walker ID. Hormone replacement therapy and venous thromboembolism. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guidelines 2000; http://www.rcog.org.uk.
  22. British National Formulary. 41st ed. London: British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain; 2001.
  23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. ACOG practice bulletin no. 21. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2000.


     
Current issue | Search journal | Archived issues | Classifieds | Hotline (free ads)
Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals